Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/01/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] 50mm 2.8 @ f5,6
From: jefferys at gmail.com (Jeffery Smith)
Date: Sun Jan 16 11:45:23 2005
References: <ILENJKCCOJOKJFHFEFACCEPJCGAA.luisripoll@telefonica.net> <p06200704be0ed3a4cbce@131.142.12.152> <000e01c4fb18$a79d7e80$42ec4142@D1S9FY41> <02DDFCD2-671C-11D9-979F-000A95DD7D76@charter.net> <Pine.SOL.4.58-L.0501161848170.2512@hedvig.uio.no> <76ba89b3050116103559e7b235@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.SOL.4.58-L.0501161936530.4929@hedvig.uio.no>

Next time you walk by it, change the D to an O.


On Sun, 16 Jan 2005 19:37:47 +0100 (MET), Daniel Ridings
<daniel.ridings@edd.uio.no> wrote:
> I think it's supposed to be "DJ", Jeffery.
> 
> OJ ... I thought "orange juice" first ... but I realized soon enough who
> you meant :)
> 
> Daniel
> 
> On Sun, 16 Jan 2005, Jeffery Smith wrote:
> 
> > Jeeze...even the Swedes don't like OJ.
> >
> >
> > On Sun, 16 Jan 2005 18:51:38 +0100 (MET), Daniel Ridings
> > <daniel.ridings@edd.uio.no> wrote:
> > > I've used the 50/2.8 quite often. Don't know why. Because it's small, I
> > > guess.
> > >
> > > It figures in at least three PAW's last year:
> > >
> > > http://www.dlridings.com/paw2004/1.html
> > > http://www.dlridings.com/paw2004/2.html
> > > http://www.dlridings.com/paw2004/44.html
> > >
> > > I like it enough to consider getting the new version and off-load the 
> > > old
> > > one.
> > >
> > > Then again ... I'm starting to get partial to Leica's 1.4 offerings ...
> > > (not the new Summilux though. It's probably great, but I can't afford 
> > > it.)
> > >
> > > Daniel
> > >
> > > On Sat, 15 Jan 2005, Slobodan Dimitrov wrote:
> > >
> > > > The Elmar-M is adequate at any aperture. Judging from what's been 
> > > > shown
> > > > on the list as examples, those images for the most part suffer from
> > > > camera motion and poor post production adjustments.
> > > > S. Dimitrov
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Leica Users Group.
> > > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> > > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Leica Users Group.
> > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

In reply to: Message from luisripoll at telefonica.net (Luis Ripoll) ([Leica] 50mm 2.8 @ f5,6)
Message from sethrosner at nycap.rr.com (Seth Rosner) ([Leica] 50mm 2.8 @ f5,6)
Message from s.dimitrov at charter.net (Slobodan Dimitrov) ([Leica] 50mm 2.8 @ f5,6)
Message from daniel.ridings at edd.uio.no (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] 50mm 2.8 @ f5,6)
Message from jefferys at gmail.com (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] 50mm 2.8 @ f5,6)
Message from daniel.ridings at edd.uio.no (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] 50mm 2.8 @ f5,6)