Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2019/09/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Street Photography
From: imra at iol.ie (Douglas Barry)
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 14:02:30 +0100
References: <CA+3n+_n1UK1rUU_rxnJ7-x3zWv0EZu2uHTQuos1n-eQy4NiQqQ@mail.gmail.com> <22820D54-0A6D-48FE-9C63-2A9B1C147198@gmail.com> <003a01d57295$94847560$bd8d6020$@ca> <89B65447-5660-431C-81E2-C95585423FC9@rabinergroup.com>

What a lot of guff is swilling around about this term. Pulling a book 
down from my shelf, I see "What distinguishes Doisneau's street 
photography of the 1940s and 1950s is a capacity for narrative" blah, 
blah. This comes from the 1997 Phaidon "The Photo Book". So that puts it 
at least 22 years old. I rather suspect the term may be a lot older, but 
who cares. English is an embracing and mutable tongue, and who can count 
the number of photography terms and movements out there?

Douglas


On 24/09/2019 06:33, Mark Rabiner wrote:
> My two cents if the "Street Photography" term using phenomenon just 
> admitted what it was instead of insinuating that it's been this ongoing 
> longtime thing that everyone has always known about it but you were not 
> paying attention it would not be so bad. I have nothing much against 
> sometimes using a buzz word of the moment or click bait or weasel words 
> which pretend to mean something but which are just messing with you.
> But the "Street" thing doesn't own up to it. I think many of them just 
> want to feel a connect with the college kids who are just flipping off 
> knowing anything about the art world or journalism and just want to walk 
> around taking pictures and somehow be meaningful... rebellious.
>
> But I think there are two main categories in photography which overlap a 
> lot:
> Job titles and genres.
> The Job titles describe you and the genres describe your photographs.
> If you are showing somebody a landscape it's a Landscape. That?s the Genre 
> your image is part of.
>   If it?s a big part of what you always do you can say you are a Landscape 
> photographer and have it on your business card.. And when people see your 
> images they might believe you.
> The Yellow Pages had two categories for photography. Doctors only got one 
> and Lawyers only got one.
> Commercial and Portrait.
> If you were a landscape photographer I think that fit into neither 
> Commercial nor Portrait..
> Landscape it think is a sub category of Art Photography. The Gallery 
> market. Art Collectors.
> And you could not even look those up Art Photography in the Yellow Pages.
>
>   
>   
>



Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Street Photography)
Reply from photo.philippe.amard at gmail.com (Philippe) ([Leica] Street Photography)
In reply to: Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] Street Photography)
Message from photo.philippe.amard at gmail.com (Philippe) ([Leica] Street Photography)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] Street Photography)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Street Photography)