Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/12/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMPORTANT: LUGbook 2015
From: tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant)
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 22:35:02 -0800
References: <CAE3QcF5JM6e7f3esj4pd0=YphOphbwjKbUhyiP8DNKj0LyrDQQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAGHtf7HVoC62qMBw9y4etX0wF8ujomt29U49mYaN61L-BpaBOw@mail.gmail.com> <CAF8hL-EN3mTW4yU8fzJjKmYfcmCt560gvprwbVV65NfFigTojg@mail.gmail.com> <5EEC2BC8-78D9-495C-8DAD-21EE3FC83471@cartersxrd.net> <CAGHtf7Em+Fw9YUD=k5miT08nvur08SC_0VUP-YL-FaTi5Zj2oA@mail.gmail.com>

Richard my dear friend do your thing and to hell with the whiners and 
bitchers!  My response to them politely is? "GET STUFFED!" :-)

The LUG YEAR BOOK was never written in stone how / who / what! Yes we 
started out all images should be the results of a LEICA click!
And the same wonderful lad JIM SHULMAN put it together right on time  and 
everyone was gung ho to go FOR YEARS! 

Well for several years Jim Shulman was "BOOK MASTER EXTRAORDINAIRE!" 
It was neat and the crew didn't require any ranting to get photos in as it 
was seen as a "cool showing of our pictures!" ALL OF US!
As I see it should still be! "WE THE LUG CREW!"

You ain't one of use? Go some place else! Unfortunately there are too many 
losers in our cruel cold world and we need visitors to continue to be as A 
BOOK wonderful looking as we have always been!

UNFORTUNATLEY! We have seen the past few years, the true LUG members appear 
to have dwindled! We've had to reach out to "whomever?" aspects  of the 
photographic community worldwide. And I'm first to jump in "WE HAVE HAD SOME 
VERY FINE IMAGES ADDED TO THE BOOK!" 

So Richard my Son, please do your own thing as the bottom line is?
"Make it the best damn photography book possible as you see it!!"
Thank you good Sir! To "heck with the whiners as it hasn't cost them a 
penny!"  Your response? GET STUFFED! :-)
cheers,
Dr. ted



nal Message-----
From: LUG [mailto:lug-bounces+tedgrant=shaw.ca at leica-users.org] On Behalf 
Of Gene Duprey
Sent: December-18-15 4:36 PM
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: Re: [Leica] IMPORTANT: LUGbook 2015

Richard,

In past years I think the order was by when they sent in the photos.

As far as I am concerned, it is your project this year and you should order
the photos the way you want to.  If you want to mix them then great do it.
If it makes the photos larger on the page, then that is good for everyone.
 if someone has to look for their photos over several pages, Big Whoop!  I
will not be crying, foul or otherwise.  *Again It is Your Project this
year, and you need to do it the way you want.*  *If someone does not like
it, then they can volunteer to do it next year.*

All I care is that I've got my 2 photos in it again this year.  If I have
to look through the whole book to find them, It won't break my heart one
tiny bit.  Do It Your Way!

Thanks for your hard work,

Gene


On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 5:07 PM, RicCarter <ric at cartersxrd.net> wrote:

> Richard?you the man?do it as you like
>
> If anyone finds this inconvenient, they should just let us know and we?ll
> send a couple of photos to do it their way
>
> nobody hired you Richard, so we don?t get to boss you around
>
> thanks again for your labor
>
> ric
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Dec 18, 2015, at 5:03 PM, Richard Man <richard at richardmanphoto.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Dear LUG family and contributors:
> >
> > I have a received a strong objection to making the change. Fundamentally,
> > it comes down to two things:
> >
> > First, the nature of the policy change is unexpected and last minute. It
> is
> > true, if I have made the decision early on and made the announcement
> > earlier, then people who may object to this policy can debate or withhold
> > contributions. For this I apologize.
> >
> > Second, there are questions of my exerting artistic preference over that
> of
> > the contributors. I need to digest this, as the mere fact that an editor
> > has to sequence the contributors in some ways regardless, even if we do
> it
> > simply by the first name or last name or other arbitrary ordering, it's a
> > decision on our parts.
> >
> > The person is correct that this is not "my book", but nominally a "LUG
> year
> > book" although even there we have strayed a bit in previous years by
> > inviting other people into the fold.
> >
> > I am somewhat torn on this and I welcome any discussion. I am not looking
> > for sympathy, or people to "beat up" on the person. I know from feedback
> > that someone will be unhappy regardless. However, personally I am more
> > concerned that it is true that I did not make the policy change early,
> and
> > this would appear to be a "bait and switch".
> >
> > Thank you.
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Gene Duprey <geneduprey2015 at 
> > gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Make it your production, If you want to mix the photos, then I'm OK with
> >> it.
> >>
> >> Gene
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 4:03 AM, Geoff Hopkinson <hopsternew at 
> >> gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Your call! Why not put your own stamp on the production?
> >>> Shall be interested to see how this works out...my ex-editor brain is
> >>> fascinated!
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> ..................................................................................................................................
> >>>
> >>> While working on the book, I am making an executive decision: I will
> >>> sequence the images in some order, and not 2 consecutive images per
> >>> submitter like previous years.
> >>>
> >>> Per usual, I will not edit the images in any way, and the caption and
> any
> >>> image placement preference (e.g. some people want full bleed) will be
> >>> honored.
> >>>
> >>> If you have strong feeling that your photos must be kept together,
> please
> >>> email me.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks!
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>
> >>> // http://facebook.com/richardmanphoto
> >>> // https://instagram.com/richardmanphoto
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Cheers
> >>> Geoff
> >>> http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Leica Users Group.
> >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >>>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Leica Users Group.
> >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>
> > // http://facebook.com/richardmanphoto
> > // https://instagram.com/richardmanphoto
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus


Replies: Reply from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] IMPORTANT: LUGbook 2015)
In reply to: Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] IMPORTANT: LUGbook 2015)
Message from geneduprey2015 at gmail.com (Gene Duprey) ([Leica] IMPORTANT: LUGbook 2015)
Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] IMPORTANT: LUGbook 2015)
Message from ric at cartersxrd.net (RicCarter) ([Leica] IMPORTANT: LUGbook 2015)
Message from geneduprey2015 at gmail.com (Gene Duprey) ([Leica] IMPORTANT: LUGbook 2015)