Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/10/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]That is one huge lens. I would only need two, though. That one and the fast 50 should cover anything I photograph. I'm still debating. This review sounds pretty good: http://www.slack.co.uk/2015/The_Leica_SL.html Tina On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 2:57 PM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.fr> wrote: > It is the lenses, almost same size and weight as S lenses! > > https://farm6.staticflickr.com/5790/21615453253_1c85b372e2_c.jpg > > SL compared to a D810 with 24-120/4 lens.... > > (from > http://blog.mingthein.com/2015/10/21/premiere-review-2015-leica-sl-601/ ) > > john > > > -----Original Message----- > > It's really not that big of a camera, but folks are hung up on this idea > that a mirrorless camera has to be a tiny little thing. > SL size compared to a digital M: > https://tinyurl.com/ppbdsr8 > > I look forward to seeing what you can do with it, Tina. > > Jay > > On 10/21/2015 3:17 PM, Tina Manley wrote: > > Has anybody posted a photo of it compared to the size of the M9 or the > > M240? The Sony and Fuji mirrorless cameras are actually too small and > > too light for me. > > > > Tina > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > -- Tina Manley www.tinamanley.com tina-manley.artistwebsites.com http://www.alamy.com/stock-photography/3B49552F-90A0-4D0A-A11D-2175C937AA91/Tina+Manley.html