Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/10/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] BIG new Leica - TINA
From: tmanley at (Tina Manley)
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 15:00:05 -0400
References: <> <2C541B23B89148AAAA55C230DCF79ED2@Family> <BLU404-EAS37856C32E2C42E4C78D602CB8380@phx.gbl> <003801d10c4c$d01749d0$7045dd70$> <> <> <0ab901d10cfb$86e1e1d0$94a5a570$>

That is one huge lens.  I would only need two, though.  That one and the
fast 50 should cover anything I photograph.  I'm still debating.  This
review sounds pretty good:


On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 2:57 PM, John McMaster <john at> wrote:

> It is the lenses, almost same size and weight as S lenses!
> SL compared to a D810 with 24-120/4 lens....
> (from
> )
> john
> -----Original Message-----
> It's really not that big of a camera, but folks are hung up on this idea
> that a mirrorless camera has to be a tiny little thing.
> SL size compared to a digital M:
> I look forward to seeing what you can do with it, Tina.
> Jay
> On 10/21/2015 3:17 PM, Tina Manley wrote:
> > Has anybody posted a photo of it compared to the size of the M9 or the
> > M240?  The Sony and Fuji mirrorless cameras are actually too small and
> > too light for me.
> >
> > Tina
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See for more information

Tina Manley

Replies: Reply from mark at (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] BIG new Leica - TINA)
In reply to: Message from sonc.hegr at (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] BIG new Leica)
Message from imra at (Douglas Barry) ([Leica] BIG new Leica)
Message from leica_r8 at (Aram Langhans) ([Leica] BIG new Leica)
Message from red735i at (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] BIG new Leica)
Message from tmanley at (Tina Manley) ([Leica] BIG new Leica)
Message from leica at (Jay Burleson) ([Leica] BIG new Leica - TINA)
Message from john at (John McMaster) ([Leica] BIG new Leica - TINA)