Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/10/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Its the Leica R digital. But Leica SL digital sure sounds better. Will appeal to way more people than the medium format S Leica.. As few people are billionaires On 10/22/15 3:00 PM, "Tina Manley" <tmanley at gmail.com> wrote: > That is one huge lens. I would only need two, though. That one and the > fast 50 should cover anything I photograph. I'm still debating. This > review sounds pretty good: > > http://www.slack.co.uk/2015/The_Leica_SL.html > > Tina > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 2:57 PM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.fr> wrote: > >> It is the lenses, almost same size and weight as S lenses! >> >> https://farm6.staticflickr.com/5790/21615453253_1c85b372e2_c.jpg >> >> SL compared to a D810 with 24-120/4 lens.... >> >> (from >> http://blog.mingthein.com/2015/10/21/premiere-review-2015-leica-sl-601/ ) >> >> john >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> It's really not that big of a camera, but folks are hung up on this idea >> that a mirrorless camera has to be a tiny little thing. >> SL size compared to a digital M: >> https://tinyurl.com/ppbdsr8 >> >> I look forward to seeing what you can do with it, Tina. >> >> Jay >> >> On 10/21/2015 3:17 PM, Tina Manley wrote: >>> Has anybody posted a photo of it compared to the size of the M9 or the >>> M240? The Sony and Fuji mirrorless cameras are actually too small and >>> too light for me. >>> >>> Tina >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > > -- Mark William Rabiner Photographer http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/