Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2015/10/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
Subject: [Leica] BIG new Leica - TINA
From: leica at jayburleson.com (Jay Burleson)
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 22:49:14 -0700
References: <CAFfkXxuPQRq2bGQCAcfvCdJ_cDidre6fPSOG8NK4xtAOAampEw@mail.gmail.com> <2C541B23B89148AAAA55C230DCF79ED2@Family> <BLU404-EAS37856C32E2C42E4C78D602CB8380@phx.gbl> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <CA+yJO1Bmma5Rq3w+CKW_nvdd6mmExVb40MFsczjH8T3QvVJLBA@mail.gmail.com>
It's really not that big of a camera, but folks are hung up on this idea
that a mirrorless camera has to be a tiny little thing.
SL size compared to a digital M:
I look forward to seeing what you can do with it, Tina.
On 10/21/2015 3:17 PM, Tina Manley wrote:
> Has anybody posted a photo of it compared to the size of the M9 or the
> M240? The Sony and Fuji mirrorless cameras are actually too small and too
> light for me.
Reply from john at mcmaster.fr (John McMaster) ([Leica] BIG new Leica - TINA)
In reply to:
Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] BIG new Leica)
Message from imra at iol.ie (Douglas Barry) ([Leica] BIG new Leica)
Message from leica_r8 at hotmail.com (Aram Langhans) ([Leica] BIG new Leica)
Message from red735i at verizon.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] BIG new Leica)
Message from tmanley at gmail.com (Tina Manley) ([Leica] BIG new Leica)