Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/06/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Using the Fuji X Pro-1
From: bd at bdcolenphoto.com (B. D. Colen)
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 12:02:25 -0400

Ed, I have been doing this ever since Adobe introduced the DNG converter -
I go from the card to DNG and then work with the DNGs. It has worked
beautiful with Olympus, Panasonic, and Fuji X100 RAW files. I've never
wasted time with the proprietary convertors.

On 6/26/12 11:56 AM, "Edward Kowaleski" <ekowaleski at twmi.rr.com> wrote:

>Thanks for the update.  I'm looking forward to handling it when I see you
>in
>Bar Harbor.
>
>Do you have an opinion of the quality of images generated from DNG files
>that have been converted from proprietary Fuji or Nikon RAW files?  I know
>you find the conversion a little (or lots) longer but is there any
>qualitative difference?
>
>I have been converting all my Panasonic or Nikon RAW images to DNG as soon
>as I take the chip out of the camera.  It makes subsequent processing and
>storage simpler (to me) and keeps all my RAW files on one platform  which
>I
>feel confident that Adobe will maintain similar to their Acrobat PDF
>files.
>I'd appreciate your thoughts on this.
>
>Ed
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: lug-bounces+ekowaleski=twmi.rr.com at leica-users.org
>[mailto:lug-bounces+ekowaleski=twmi.rr.com at leica-users.org] On Behalf Of
>Richard Taylor
>Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 8:29 AM
>To: Leica Users Group
>Subject: [Leica] Using the Fuji X Pro-1
>
>I've had my X Pro-1 for two weeks now and in thought you might be
>interested
>in my impressions of the camera.  There are many images on line testifying
>to its excellent image quality at low and high ISO so I'm not going to add
>more--at least for now.  What they show is all true, though, in my
>experience.
>
>If you've been following the discussions about the camera, not all of this
>will be new to you.
>
>In a nutshell, it is the most M-like digital camera I've yet run across.
>The aperture dial is on the lens where it belongs, ditto for the shutter
>speed dial and exposure correction dials on the body, and you can set the
>Fn
>button to bring up ISO settings, so everything you're likely to need in
>routine shooting is right out in the open.  The body is just a bit smaller
>than the M9 and weighs about half as much.
>
>With the Fujinon lenses, focus is just like the Leica, except it's
>automatic.  Aim the focus rectangle in the OVF at the point you want in
>focus, half press the shutter, watch the frame lines jump into place,
>reframe if necessary and shoot.  Perfect!  When you're close in you've got
>to use the lower right focus rectangle to correct for parallax, but
>otherwise the procedure is the same.  Focus speed is more than fast
>enough,
>but nowhere near as fast as my Panasonic GX-1.
>
>If you place the focus rectangle correctly, the focus will be spot-on.
>
>OTH, the camera, despite the inclusion of a "Multi-Spot" mode, really
>doesn't have one as far as I've can tell.  If you put it in Multi-Spot, it
>will choose the single most contrasty spot in the frame to focus on,
>whether
>it's your subject's eye or a lightbulb in the far corner of the frame.  I
>don't see why this method would work under any circumstances, but maybe
>one
>of you can enlighten me.
>
>The only way you can shoot from the hip is to lock focus on an appropriate
>middle distance and stop way down, again just as you would do with an M.
>
>I can see the frames lines and data in the OVF with my regular glasses on.
>If I'm wearing polarizing sunglasses and holding the camera horizontally,
>though, I can't either in the OVF or anything at all in the EVF.   With
>the
>LCD on the camera back it's the other way around.  It's readable with the
>camera horizontal, but not vertical.
>
>Opinions can differ on this of course, but for my purposes LR 4 does a
>better job of processing the RAW files than the Fuji RAW converter does.
>There is less blotchy chroma noise and sharpness is almost as good.  OTH,
>converting the RAW files to DNG and importing them into LR seems to take
>forever, maybe 3-4 times as long as it takes to import files from my
>D300.  
>
>The only thing about the camera that drives me nuts is the power switch.
>Whoever designed it needs to go in for some remedial work on detent
>design.
>Even the slightest brush of the hand or the side of a camera bags turns
>the
>camera on.   Bad, bad, bad.
>
>
>Regards, 
>
>Dick
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>




In reply to: Message from ekowaleski at twmi.rr.com (Edward Kowaleski) ([Leica] Using the Fuji X Pro-1)