Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/03/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] B&W Leica? Higher ISO
From: richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man)
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 15:43:35 -0700
References: <380-220123314212710561@M2W122.mail2web.com> <CAFfkXxt7Awmq3Fg4JGC8Uq4sv3NdW9zmgJSd7UbuAH1f71uWYw@mail.gmail.com> <CABmfTOVLKR3050qhNRXOmJPYXThGdzqE9jksN1MhsCMVHskgMA@mail.gmail.com> <CALCsb0G7mj+S=MDXDmjEcr6GCC53j3EZBkQ5gsQddfCq2wt15Q@mail.gmail.com> <99FE2FD0-2CDE-4F13-B30F-A12AD94038D4@teleport.com>

Mark - high dynamic range is NOT the same as high ISO.



On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Mark Kronquist <mak at teleport.com> wrote:

> I shoot with a Nikon D3. FX Full Frame like the M9.  The D3 has a native
> (and clean) ISO6400 with H1 and H2 giving "ISO 25,400 or so"
>
> The D3x (?) and D4 and D800 go to 102,000. Why?
>
> If I could 2/3 more "speed" by using a B&W sensor I could achieve what ISO
> 306.000 or so?
>
> Or a clean IS 18,600 or so
>
> WHY?
>
> This scene is illuminated by the moonlight reflected from my cat's eye? At
> what point doe it get to be overkill?
>
>
> On Mar 14, 2012, at 3:24 PM, Kay Yang wrote:
>
> > Does that mean all those color filters for B&W will be in demand again?
> LOL.
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Marty Deveney <benedenia at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> If Leica really does this I am already there.
> >>
> >> Marty
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Sonny Carter <sonc.hegr at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 4:27 PM, wildlightphoto at earthlink.net <
> >>> wildlightphoto at earthlink.net> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> To get B&W from an RGB digital camera you throw away 2/3 of the image
> >> data.
> >>>> A B&W-only camera could be much more sensitive (higher ISO) and higher
> >>>> resolution.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Um, if you change the mode to BW, that is true, but if you simply
> >>> desaturate the image, the file stays the same size, and I presume all
> the
> >>> information remains.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Regards,
> >>>
> >>> Sonny
> >>> http://sonc.com/look/
> >>> http://sonc-hegr.tumblr.com/
> >>> Natchitoches, Louisiana
> >>>
> >>> USA
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Leica Users Group.
> >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Leica Users Group.
> >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
// richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>


Replies: Reply from photo.forrest at earthlink.net (Phil Forrest) ([Leica] B&W Leica? Higher ISO)
In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (wildlightphoto at earthlink.net) ([Leica] B&W Leica?)
Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] B&W Leica?)
Message from benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney) ([Leica] B&W Leica?)
Message from liangjiyang at gmail.com (Kay Yang) ([Leica] B&W Leica?)
Message from mak at teleport.com (Mark Kronquist) ([Leica] B&W Leica? Higher ISO)