Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/03/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Heehee, you're welcome. The most straightforward explanation is often THE explanation. I am waiting for the tone curve issues to resolve before re-upgrading. I can't afford to lose time on that. On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Herbert Kanner <kanner at acm.org> wrote: > Thanks, Richard. You hit the nail right on the head. > > Herb > > > > Make sure the the resize options did not accidentally get set. >> >> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 3:02 PM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz> >> wrote: >> >> > Do they look any different when opened outside of LR? >> > >> > john >> > ______________________________**__________ >> > >> > I exported the same picture from LR4, without any additional >> > processing, that I had previously exported from LR3. They were >> > exported as .jpg and all export parameters but "Quality" were exactly >> > the same. The LR3 export, with Quality set around 75 produced a 3.2 >> > MB jpeg. LR4, with Quality set to 100, produced a jpet of only 303 KB. >> > >> > >> > ______________________________**_________________ >> > Leica Users Group. >> > See >> http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>for >> more information >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> // richard >> <http://www.richardmanphoto.**com<http://www.richardmanphoto.com> >> > >> >> ______________________________**_________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See >> http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>for >> more information >> > > -- > Herbert Kanner > kanner at acm.org > 650-326-8204 > > Question authority and the authorities will question you. > > ______________________________**_________________ > Leica Users Group. > See > http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>for > more information > -- // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>