Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/02/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]The Imacon scan at this magnification looks like the same scan as the Epson only with 10% more unsharp mask. -------------------- Mark William Rabiner Photography http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/ mark at rabinergroup.com Cars: http://tinyurl.com/2f7ptxb > From: Lluis Ripoll Querol <lluisripollquerol at gmail.com> > Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 02:40:29 +0100 > To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Subject: [Leica] Compare: Imacon vs Epson Scanner > > Just a test after our conversations about scanners, I suppose will be > interesting for all > > I've gave to my professional Lab a 6x6 negative to be scanned on their > Imacon Flextight 848, later I have scanned the same negative with my > Epson 3170, here you can compare: > > (PLEASE VIEW LARGE) > > > With Epson > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Miscellaneous/2011020101wEP.jpg.html > > With Imacon > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Miscellaneous/2011020101wIM.jpg.html > > A detail with Epson > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Miscellaneous/2011020101crwEP.jpg.html > > A detail with Imacon > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Miscellaneous/2011020101crwIM.jpg.html > > Pictures with Rolleiflex TLR, Zeiss Planar 2.8/80mm, Tri X 320 ISO > > A big difference!, in price too!. I can't afford an Imacon, but I can > gave them my best negatives to scann. > > Saludos cordiales > Lluis > > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/ > http://photo.net/photos/lluisripoll > Blog: > http://lluisripollphotography.wordpress.com/ > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information