Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/02/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I don't see any real difference in sharpness. The Epson image has more contrast, but that may be because of the way the software was set. -- Chris Crawford Fine Art Photography Fort Wayne, Indiana 260-486-2581 http://www.chriscrawfordphoto.com My portfolio http://blog.chriscrawfordphoto.com My latest work! http://www.facebook.com/pages/Christopher-Crawford/48229272798 Become a fan on Facebook On 2/21/11 8:40 PM, "Lluis Ripoll" <lluisripollquerol at gmail.com> wrote: > Just a test after our conversations about scanners, I suppose will be > interesting for all > > I've gave to my professional Lab a 6x6 negative to be scanned on their > Imacon Flextight 848, later I have scanned the same negative with my > Epson 3170, here you can compare: > > (PLEASE VIEW LARGE) > > > With Epson > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Miscellaneous/2011020101wEP.jpg.html > > With Imacon > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Miscellaneous/2011020101wIM.jpg.html > > A detail with Epson > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Miscellaneous/2011020101crwEP.jpg.html > > A detail with Imacon > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Miscellaneous/2011020101crwIM.jpg.html > > Pictures with Rolleiflex TLR, Zeiss Planar 2.8/80mm, Tri X 320 ISO > > A big difference!, in price too!. I can't afford an Imacon, but I can > gave them my best negatives to scann. > > Saludos cordiales > Lluis > > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/ > http://photo.net/photos/lluisripoll > Blog: > http://lluisripollphotography.wordpress.com/ > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information