Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/12/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] B&W or Sepia
From: daniel at dlridings.se (Daniel Ridings)
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 13:20:48 +0100
References: <AANLkTimUZY1t_15UW3D6==RDXLFmeQWOFrdfmsuOnNJt@mail.gmail.com>

I too prefer the b/w. The sepia makes things look a little "muddy".

On the other hand, I don't think I've ever preferred sepia. Maybe in a 
portrait.

Daniel

On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 5:19 PM, Lawrence Zeitlin <lrzeitlin at gmail.com> 
wrote:
> Lluis asks:
>
> Of this one I present two versions, neutral and sepia toned, I would
>
> appreciate your opinions about your preferences, thank you
>
>
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Colliure/L1016963BWS1w.jpg.html
>
>
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Colliure/L1016963bww.jpg.html
> - - - - -
> I'm glad to see that I share in the majority opinion this time. I prefer 
> the
> B&W version. The features are more distinct. The foreground shows better
> detail and the contrast between the boat and the water lends snap. The 
> photo
> has an interesting composition that draws your eye right to the center. An
> excellent picture. That's not to say that the sepia version is a dog, But
> the toning left everything look a little muddy. Seen by itself it would be 
> a
> good picture. But the B&W version is clearly better in a side to side
> comparison.
> Larry Z
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


In reply to: Message from lrzeitlin at gmail.com (Lawrence Zeitlin) ([Leica] B&W or Sepia)