Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/08/09

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] 8/9/10
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2010 18:44:08 -0400

Just off the phone with an old friend who tells me somebody she knows is
getting married on 10 10 10 day.

I told her the reason why 8 9 10 day was brought to my attention is somebody
I know is getting married today. That's how I first heard of it.

People take these numbers very seriously.
For other people its letters in the alphabet.

--------------------
Mark William Rabiner
Photography
mark at rabinergroup.com


> From: Lawrence Zeitlin <lrzeitlin at gmail.com>
> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 13:14:20 -0400
> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Subject: Re: [Leica] 8/9/10
> 
> The "correct" date trivia eclipses the discussion of Tilly hats and single
> malt scotches and matches all the balderdash about sensor sizes. If Luggers
> want to be completely logical they should use the Julian date (named after
> my uncle Julius). Real scientists do. Look it up in Wikipedia.
> I label all my photos using the "Leica" date, a chronological listing of
> days starting from November 1, 1879, the birthday of Oskar Barnack. 
> However,
> I choose my daily wardrobe based on the conventional MM/DD/YY format since,
> as Rei pointed out, the month is the most important determinant in deciding
> to wear shorts or woolies.
> 
> Larry Z
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information




In reply to: Message from lrzeitlin at gmail.com (Lawrence Zeitlin) ([Leica] 8/9/10)