Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/05/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Sony cleans up; takes no prisoners.
From: jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj)
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 15:15:13 +0530
References: <C82302DB.62E37%mark@rabinergroup.com> <0F4DB10D-D050-4D3F-93A2-D65706537C0A@btinternet.com> <69E1FEE2-F650-4F3A-BEE2-11B2AA59FFD3@steveunsworth.co.uk> <AANLkTimmpkxV8caGF2mRa86hRHdFx4iTPQcFM_7A5w-D@mail.gmail.com> <E792D6C0-2665-4ADE-BAC2-8364748EC075@steveunsworth.co.uk>

Steve,
I used Howard Cummer's GF-1 when we were together in March, and thought it
was a terrific carry around camera except for the EVF, which I did not like,
and decided to wait for the next generation to buy one. The price I was
offered one for here today changed my mind.
Cheers
Jayanand


On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Steve Unsworth <lug at 
steveunsworth.co.uk>wrote:

> It is, my mistake.
>
> I don't think you'll be disappointed - especially at that price. The lens
> is fully usable wide open, and has shallow DOF when used close up. I 
> snapped
> these at f1.7 the other week...
>
> <http://www.flickr.com/photos/39877124 at N05/4644485760/>
>
> <http://www.flickr.com/photos/39877124 at N05/4644496286/>
>
> Incidentally the new feature added to Lightroom 3 makes uploading
> photographs to Flickr very easy as it's all done from with Lightroom 
> itself.
>
> Steve
>
> On 27 May 2010, at 09:53, Jayanand Govindaraj wrote:
>
> > I thought the GF-1 was a 2x sensor..I just bought one second hand at
> US$580
> > with a 20mm lens, no EVF. Waiting for delivery as I write..
> > Cheers
> > Jayanand
> >
> > On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Steve Unsworth <lug at 
> > steveunsworth.co.uk
> >wrote:
> >
> >> With the GF-1 I struggle to see the screen clearly in bright daylight.
> This
> >> has made using Leica lenses on the thing a waste of time. With the 20mm
> I
> >> can rely on the AF and there's enough definition for an overall
> composition,
> >> with an M lens it's a lottery whether the subject is in focus or not -
> and
> >> that includes when the magnifier is used.
> >>
> >> Also the performance with wider lenses is poor at the edge of the frame.
> >> There's a lot of quality drop off. This is with a 1.5 sensor, so I would
> >> expect anything larger to be even worse unless it uses a system of
> >> micro-lenses as in the M8/9.
> >>
> >> I accept my experience may not be typical.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Sony cleans up; takes no prisoners.)
Message from Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie) ([Leica] Sony cleans up; takes no prisoners.)
Message from lug at steveunsworth.co.uk (Steve Unsworth) ([Leica] Sony cleans up; takes no prisoners.)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] Sony cleans up; takes no prisoners.)
Message from lug at steveunsworth.co.uk (Steve Unsworth) ([Leica] Sony cleans up; takes no prisoners.)