Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/04/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I agree that the jpg is what it is; but I believe when originally opened in photoshop (or other imaging software) it expands to reveal its maximum amount of information. To then save it as a tiff or psd or DMG does preserve whatever it did have to offer. Working on a jpg and then saving as jpg will further throw away information. (or so I've been lead to believe). So I do see some value, if choosing to shoot jpg, (which I don't) to then open the jpg and save as DMG for further nondestructive editing in LR or other software. Regards, George Lottermoser george at imagist.com http://www.imagist.com http://www.imagist.com/blog http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist On Apr 29, 2010, at 5:49 PM, Oliver Bryk wrote: > Vince, > there is really nothing of value that I can add to Frank's > explanation. Your > in-camera JPG processor will have done whatever it was designed to > do, and > AFAIK that is an irreversible process. > Oliver > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information