Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/04/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMG: PAW 16 (ric)
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 10:19:26 -0500
References: <5CD331E9-E925-4094-AD6B-36609C2B93A3@embarqmail.com> <2C9DC773-ACBA-4D95-840F-D242A688C364@sfr.fr> <BB64A978-3B5E-4C94-91AA-CB6E0FEE2784@embarqmail.com> <95C0E1D6-F361-4692-B2A6-6211C022D34F@sfr.fr>

Without doubt it takes time (like years and decades)
to evolve our technique, vision and relationship to our tools and  
materials.

For me this evolution involves complex interrelationships between
hardware, software, social and aesthetic considerations and final  
output.
Most of these complexities evolve in personal, nonverbal processes.

Regards,
George Lottermoser
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist

On Apr 29, 2010, at 9:56 AM, philippe.amard wrote:

> I would tend to think that the second option is the answer, from  
> what I see of Steve's and Geoff's M9 photos, the colour rendition  
> is different. Sort of New Leica inside, using the same lenses.
> Yet you're using an M8, and from there arises the other part of my  
> questionning, i.e. how you get this M9 look from an M8, which I had  
> not noticed when viewing other luggers' posts.
>
> This is not really about technique, nor philosophy; your results  
> exceed what I had expected from an M8 thus far, really. That's all,  
> but that's a lot.



In reply to: Message from ricc at embarqmail.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] IMG: PAW 16 (ric))
Message from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard) ([Leica] IMG: PAW 16 (ric))
Message from ricc at embarqmail.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] IMG: PAW 16 (ric))
Message from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard) ([Leica] IMG: PAW 16 (ric))