Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/04/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] OT: HELP Nikon scanner neophyte
From: digiratidoc at gmail.com (James Laird)
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 11:45:31 -0500
References: <v2mdaaeb97e1004280816scddeabf5idc2ac6da4261e778@mail.gmail.com> <20100428155847.GG526@selenium.125px.com> <s2jdaaeb97e1004281914ue61366e1l308ef1389bb8ea25@mail.gmail.com> <20100429033934.GK526@selenium.125px.com>

So my best bet (for B&W) is to start with Vuescan and try Nikonscan
for my color slides and negatives?

Jim

On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:39 PM, Tim Gray <tgray at 125px.com> wrote:
> On Apr 28, 2010 at 09:14 PM -0500, James Laird wrote:
>>
>> I saw the updates for Nikonscan on their webite and downloaded them.
>> What's the difference between Vuescan and Nikonscan? (Mind you I don't
>> even have the scanner yet, I'm just trying to get ahead of the
>> learning curve;)
>
> Nikonscan lets you use digital ICE for one, which is nice for color neg and
> slides. ?It removes dust and scratches for you. ?It doesn't work on silver
> B&W however. ?Nikonscan also does some interpretation of the color for you.
> I've been happy with Nikonscan's color for the most part, so I just scan in
> there for color and tweak in Photoshop.
>
> I've tried doing B&W with it, but it seems harder for me to get a flat 
> scan.
> Vuescan also lets you select the channel you use to make B&W, which can 
> make
> a difference in sharpness.
>
> Since I do my own B&W, if I want small scans for flickr and such, I have to
> do them myself. ?Vuescan is pretty quick if you set it to 1333 dpi; much
> quicker than Nikonscan in my experience. ?That's enough for a 4x6 print at
> 300dpi. ?I don't dev my own color. ?I always get scans done at the time of
> dev, so I only scan the files I want at 4000dpi and I don't need this 
> faster
> small scan functionality for color.
>
> It's easy to get a flat scan of B&W negs in Vuescan.
>
> So the long and short of it is that I find Vuescan faster for low res scans
> and easy to get flat B&W scans, while Nikonscan gives good color for me and
> lets me use ICE, so I use that for color.
>
> I don't know how well Vuescan works with the 9000 or the batch feeders on
> the 5000. ?You might get more functionality out of those scanners with
> Nikonscan.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


Replies: Reply from tgray at 125px.com (Tim Gray) ([Leica] OT: HELP Nikon scanner neophyte)
In reply to: Message from digiratidoc at gmail.com (James Laird) ([Leica] OT: HELP Nikon scanner neophyte)
Message from tgray at 125px.com (Tim Gray) ([Leica] OT: HELP Nikon scanner neophyte)
Message from digiratidoc at gmail.com (James Laird) ([Leica] OT: HELP Nikon scanner neophyte)
Message from tgray at 125px.com (Tim Gray) ([Leica] OT: HELP Nikon scanner neophyte)