Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/04/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] A camera for your pocket.... if you can wait a bit longer
From: passaro.vince at gmail.com (Vince Passaro)
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 22:51:22 -0400
References: <u2n19b6d42d1004232104q2889ba58w78db34bb21569864@mail.gmail.com> <124291508.885821272157415115.JavaMail.root@dsmdc-mail-mbs12> <r2r36172e5a1004241831m3e795440tbdbca5fd1c852621@mail.gmail.com>

It's true. I'd never seen nor heard of the ZS7 until now, or its Euro-Asian
counterpart, the TZ10.  But they are clearly identical or very close to it.

Vince

On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 9:31 PM, Geoff Hopkinson <hopsternew at 
gmail.com>wrote:

> Nope! And more things to come there.
> This camera is the Red Dot verson of the Panasonic TZ10. For some odd
> reason
> marketed as  ZS7 in USA.
>
> Cheers
> Geoff
> http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman
>
>
> On 25 April 2010 11:03, <grduprey at mchsi.com> wrote:
>
> > I thought the Panasonic/Leica contract was discontinued quite a while
> ago.
> >  I was told this last July by a Leica dealer.  I would guess that it is
> not
> > a Panasonic, but maybe another alliance?
> >
> > Gene
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Vince Passaro" <passaro.vince at gmail.com>
> > To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
> > Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 11:04:25 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
> > Subject: Re: [Leica] A camera for your pocket.... if you can wait a bit
> > longer
> >
> > On the issue of it being a Panasonic sensor, I'm not sure what difference
> > this makes, as we already know Leica doesn't make sensors. It ought to be
> > Kodak?
> >
> > But it is a CCD sensor, I notice: the Panasonic LX3 has that but the lens
> > is
> > a 2.5 zoom starting at 24mm whereas this is 12X starting at 25mm so it's
> > not
> > the same camera -- the Panasonic LX's and the earlier Digilux's were
> > essentially the same, yes? That was my impression.  Apparently many
> > connoisseurs reacted this way to the CL when it came out but now we like
> > it.
> > I suspect when Leica puts its name on something it attempts to control
> > quality sufficiently to protect its brand, which lives and dies on that
> > issue.
> >
> > AND of course the whole conversation is moot because what was wanted
> > included a viewfinder, which neither the Digilux not the LX3 has.
> >
> > Vince
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 11:49 PM, James Laird <digiratidoc at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I think I already have one. It's called a Panasonic ZS3. Only 10 MP
> > > but same lens so probably less noise. Not a bad camera, pocketable and
> > > handy but it's now discontinued.
> > >
> > > Jim Laird
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 10:40 PM, Richard Man <richard at 
> > > imagecraft.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > It's Panasonic finger nail sized sensor re-badged, with the Leica
> name
> > > > premium.
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 8:32 PM, Vince Passaro <
> > passaro.vince at gmail.com
> > > >wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> News for Larry who wanted a high quality digital pocket-sized camera
> > and
> > > we
> > > >> all argued for forty days and forty nights until Satan threatened to
> > > turn
> > > >> all our bread into rocks..... did we not know about this at the
> time?
> > B
> > > & H
> > > >> lists it at $699.  No doubt the price is locked in everywhere.
> That's
> > > $200
> > > >> more than the Canon G11 but it's much smaller and has a 12X zoom
> > (25-300
> > > >> equiv).
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/686706-USA/Leica_18391_V_LUX_20_Digital_Camera.html#Physical
> > > >>
> > > >> Ooops I forgot probably no viewfinder. Still, worth a look.
> > > >>
> > > >> _
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > // richard <http://www.imagecraft.com/>
> > > > // icc blog: <http://imagecraft.wordpress.com>
> > > > // photo blog: <http://www.5pmlight.com>
> > > > [ For technical support on ImageCraft products, please include all
> > > previous
> > > > replies in your msgs. ]
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Leica Users Group.
> > > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> > > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Leica Users Group.
> > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


In reply to: Message from passaro.vince at gmail.com (Vince Passaro) ([Leica] A camera for your pocket.... if you can wait a bit longer)
Message from grduprey at mchsi.com (grduprey at mchsi.com) ([Leica] A camera for your pocket.... if you can wait a bit longer)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] A camera for your pocket.... if you can wait a bit longer)