Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/04/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]> Yep, subjective, I agree. Reportedly design overseen by an ex-Panasonic > employee (now Solms) who was part of the Leica Camera/ Panasonic > connection. > He is a Leica screw mount enthusiast. > Being objective then, by my measurements the body is 11mm narrower than my > Leica IIIc, 2mm thinner, and 10mm shorter. That might be a more meaningful > reference. > > I woudn't buy or carry one in preference to an M either but they do have > some unique qualities. > > Back to subjectively again, for me, it is much prettier in the metal than > in > illustrations and in a similar way to the grey M9. > YSAMV > > Your Subjective Assessment May Vary ;-) > > Cheers > Geoff > http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman The Leica A in 1925 had a fixed lens. It was a success for five years before the Leica 1 came out in 1930 with the 39mm thread. But the Leica A was made for eleven years. People liked it because with no lenses coming off their sensor would never get dirty. [Rabs] Mark William Rabiner