Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/04/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Micro 4/3rds
From: passaro.vince at gmail.com (Vince Passaro)
Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2010 00:53:55 -0400
References: <1192883.1270175743743.JavaMail.root@wamui-june.atl.sa.earthlink.net> <9338FA5F-932C-4B5C-9C84-62FF280E273C@gmail.com>

Jeffery:
It's not that IS "doesn't work" in the Pana GF-1 with the 20mm lens: it
doesn't exist. Panasonic puts it in the lenses but not in a lens that small.
Olympus puts it in the body.


On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Jeffery Smith <jsmith342 at gmail.com> wrote:

> >From what I gather, the image stabilization doesn't work on the Panasonic
> GF-1 with the 20/1.7 pancake. But I agree with you. And it seems like a
> sounder idea to move the sensor rather than shifting the position of
> elements in the lens.
>
> Jeffery
>
> > Sonny Carter wrote:
> >
> >> I enjoy having the stabilization in the body because it affects ALL the
> >> lenses I put on the camera.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


Replies: Reply from jsmith342 at gmail.com (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] Micro 4/3rds)
In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (Doug Herr) ([Leica] Micro 4/3rds)
Message from jsmith342 at gmail.com (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] Micro 4/3rds)