Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/03/31
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Maybe it has to do with production volume. CMOS is more expensive to develop then CCD. Only if high volumes can be produced the development costs can be spread over enough items to make it feasible. regards Meino de Graaf George Lottermoser wrote: > When one has both CCD and Cmos chip cameras; > and actually compares the image files; > it feels very much in "?one's realm." > > Also, the medium format backs are CCD. > Why? > > Regards, > George Lottermoser > george at imagist.com > http://www.imagist.com > http://www.imagist.com/blog > http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist > > On Mar 29, 2010, at 11:06 PM, Mark Rabiner wrote: > >> The whole CCD vs. CMOS thing is out of my realm as well as I bet anyone's >> here > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > >