Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/03/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] A question on LR v PS
From: douglas.sharp at gmx.de (Douglas Sharp)
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 00:09:14 +0100
References: <19b6d42d1003202138h3f8984b7kc5a5b04ec518f5d6@mail.gmail.com> <p06230905c7cb55c1e18b@192.168.1.5> <19b6d42d1003210935h4c2fef0ey77626a423a65c3a3@mail.gmail.com> <19b6d42d1003210942q797d3846ud9f911671914ae24@mail.gmail.com> <p06230908c7cc0f596129@192.168.1.5> <eb6799211003211544u12f86317v844f12eafc74dfb0@mail.gmail.com>

Richard,

I haven't tried it, but I suspect it could be done by making a snapshot 
of the settings to the point before and of the settings after the point 
you wish to delete. Save as copy settings and apply to a duplicate of 
the shot you're working on with paste settings.

Though I must admit, I?m really not sure whether you can snapshot 
selected settings.

To a certain extent, the list shown when copying settings could also be 
edited to delete the step you don?t want.

Cheers
Douglas

On 21.03.2010 23:44, Richard Man wrote:
> What LR needs is a way to disable/enable/delete an intermediate editing
> instruction. For example, let say you slap on a gradient, and then add a
> whole bunch of other stuff. AFAIK, there is no way to disable or delete 
> that
> gradient without affecting the subsequent steps.
>
> On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Henning Wulff<henningw at 
> archiphoto.com>wrote:
>
>    
>> Another point which has been addressed only slightly is that LR does its
>> processing non-destructively. As you work on a file, you're really only
>> developing a set of instructions. You can have 200 instructions, but they
>> get applied once, optimally, only when you export the file or print it. 
>> The
>> original stays and never gets touched.
>>
>> Photoshop does work destructively for many of its operations. You usually
>> of course work on a copy, but once you start that many of the operations
>> only take data away from the file. You have to plan your approach properly
>> so that you lose as little as possible. Since the advent of adjustment
>> layers, this has become less of a problem, but you have to be aware of it.
>>
>> This non-destructive nature of LR is what makes it a useful tool for jpegs
>> as well. In LR, you can reasonable do contrast and level adjustments and
>> white balance adjustments on a file, whereas in PS before adjustment 
>> layers
>> and a light and knowing hand you'd be left with discontinuous mud.
>>
>> Of course, many of the options in PS are unavailable in LR, so depending 
>> on
>> what you're doing and what you want your file to look like you might well
>> have to bring it into PS for 'finishing'. But you should do all your 
>> biggest
>> adjustments and most drastic changes in LR first.
>>
>> --
>>
>>    *            Henning J. Wulff
>>   /|\      Wulff Photography&  Design
>>   /###\   mailto:henningw at archiphoto.com
>>   |[ ]|     http://www.archiphoto.com
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>      
>
>
>    


In reply to: Message from passaro.vince at gmail.com (Vince Passaro) ([Leica] A question on LR v PS)
Message from passaro.vince at gmail.com (Vince Passaro) ([Leica] A question on LR v PS)
Message from passaro.vince at gmail.com (Vince Passaro) ([Leica] A question on LR v PS)
Message from richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] A question on LR v PS)