Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/03/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] A question on LR v PS
From: richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man)
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 15:44:16 -0700
References: <19b6d42d1003202138h3f8984b7kc5a5b04ec518f5d6@mail.gmail.com> <p06230905c7cb55c1e18b@192.168.1.5> <19b6d42d1003210935h4c2fef0ey77626a423a65c3a3@mail.gmail.com> <19b6d42d1003210942q797d3846ud9f911671914ae24@mail.gmail.com> <p06230908c7cc0f596129@192.168.1.5>

What LR needs is a way to disable/enable/delete an intermediate editing
instruction. For example, let say you slap on a gradient, and then add a
whole bunch of other stuff. AFAIK, there is no way to disable or delete that
gradient without affecting the subsequent steps.

On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Henning Wulff <henningw at 
archiphoto.com>wrote:

> Another point which has been addressed only slightly is that LR does its
> processing non-destructively. As you work on a file, you're really only
> developing a set of instructions. You can have 200 instructions, but they
> get applied once, optimally, only when you export the file or print it. The
> original stays and never gets touched.
>
> Photoshop does work destructively for many of its operations. You usually
> of course work on a copy, but once you start that many of the operations
> only take data away from the file. You have to plan your approach properly
> so that you lose as little as possible. Since the advent of adjustment
> layers, this has become less of a problem, but you have to be aware of it.
>
> This non-destructive nature of LR is what makes it a useful tool for jpegs
> as well. In LR, you can reasonable do contrast and level adjustments and
> white balance adjustments on a file, whereas in PS before adjustment layers
> and a light and knowing hand you'd be left with discontinuous mud.
>
> Of course, many of the options in PS are unavailable in LR, so depending on
> what you're doing and what you want your file to look like you might well
> have to bring it into PS for 'finishing'. But you should do all your 
> biggest
> adjustments and most drastic changes in LR first.
>
> --
>
>   *            Henning J. Wulff
>  /|\      Wulff Photography & Design
>  /###\   mailto:henningw at archiphoto.com
>  |[ ]|     http://www.archiphoto.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
// richard <http://www.imagecraft.com/> blog: <
http://imagecraft.wordpress.com>
// portfolio: <http://www.imagecraft.com/pub/PICS/AnotherCalifornia2>
// mailing lists: <http://www.imagecraft.com/contact.html>
[ For technical support on ImageCraft products, please include all previous
replies in your msgs. ]


Replies: Reply from douglas.sharp at gmx.de (Douglas Sharp) ([Leica] A question on LR v PS)
Reply from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] A question on LR v PS)
In reply to: Message from passaro.vince at gmail.com (Vince Passaro) ([Leica] A question on LR v PS)
Message from passaro.vince at gmail.com (Vince Passaro) ([Leica] A question on LR v PS)
Message from passaro.vince at gmail.com (Vince Passaro) ([Leica] A question on LR v PS)