Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/03/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Crazy
From: images at comporium.net (Tina Manley)
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 15:14:59 -0500
References: <139014.47017.qm@web111701.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>

But don't we do that with choice of film and processing, too?  The actual
scene would have been in color but we choose to portray it in B&W, with a
particular lens, and processing - whether it's digital or film?

Tina

On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 3:09 PM, John Edwin Mason <profmason at 
yahoo.com>wrote:

> > This stuff is getting crazy
>
> > <http://lens.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/03/03/behind-35/>
>
> What's crazy is the way that the raw file was altered to radically alter
> the feel and meaning of the scene.  The missing sneaker is the least of the
> photo's sins:
>
> http://www.pdnpulse.com/2010/03/yet-another-photo-doctoring-scandal.html
>
> http://bit.ly/bYEjtq
>
> --John
>
> ******************************
> John Edwin Mason, Photography:
> http://www.JohnEdwinMason.com
> Charlottesville and Cape Town
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
Tina Manley, ASMP
www.tinamanley.com


In reply to: Message from profmason at yahoo.com (John Edwin Mason) ([Leica] Crazy)