Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/02/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Hassy CFV workflow suggestions?
From: richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man)
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 14:02:17 -0800
References: <C79AD34E.18889%gkase@ccfc.com> <8341105bd5892ce6ef64879a587856e8.squirrel@emailmg.globat.com> <19548.25699.qm@web82107.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <7ac27f4f1002131807q44de0868pf4c9878dd81c8c97@mail.gmail.com> <7ac27f4f1002140313w6019873en3066a98835b13423@mail.gmail.com> <36172e5a1002141354u78fb63f0gad0d715176091e3b@mail.gmail.com>

Well, my point is simply that the engines of both programs are the same code
base and will sync up eventually. If the problem is something funky with
Hassy format that makes it work under some conditions and not others, that
would be weird, but I have seen many weird things with software so it won't
be surprising.

On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 1:54 PM, Geoff Hopkinson <hopsternew at 
gmail.com>wrote:

> Richard, yes but Bob's actual core issue was that there is an uneven
> problem
> with his proprietary Raw files being recognised.
> No lesser expert than Thomas Knoll explained why in the Adobe forums if you
> are interested.
> Hint- the problem doesn't lie at Adobe's end ;-)
> Cheers
> Geoff
> http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman
>
>
> On 14 February 2010 21:13, Richard Man <richard.lists at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Yes, I just confirmed with the Photoshop developer, the RAW engines
> inside
> > both LR and Photoshop are the same, minus version skew.
> >
> > On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Richard Man <richard.lists at gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > I'm pretty sure the Adobe Photoshop and LR both use the ACR (Adobe Raw
> > > Converter) engine inside? So if CS4 supports it and LR doesn't, then it
> > may
> > > just be a matter of time for the upgrade?
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 7:59 AM, Bob Adler <rgacpa at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> I hope I'm not being redundant with what other's have said here, but I
> > >> don't think LR can import 3f files. CS4 can (Imacon just released the
> > RAW
> > >> converter for CS4) but LR can't.
> > >>
> > >> What you have to do is go in and change the .fff (or whatever it is
> for
> > >> the files from the back) to .tif. Though you would think this would
> lose
> > >> your RAW file abilities, it doesn't. It's still the RAW information.
> > This
> > >> learned after a long conversation with an Imacon tech.
> > >>
> > >> Works very well for me with my Imacon scanned RAW (.fff) files into
> LR.
> > >> Best,
> > >> Bob
> > >>  Bob Adler
> > >> Palo Alto, CA
> > >> http://www.rgaphoto.com
> > >>
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
// richard m: richard @imagecraft.com
// portfolio: <http://www.dragonsgate.net/pub/richard/PICS/AnotherCalifornia
>
blog: http://rfman.wordpress.com
// book: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/detail/745963


In reply to: Message from gkase at ccfc.com (George Kase) ([Leica] Hassy CFV workflow suggestions?)
Message from afirkin at afirkin.com (afirkin at afirkin.com) ([Leica] Hassy CFV workflow suggestions?)
Message from rgacpa at yahoo.com (Bob Adler) ([Leica] Hassy CFV workflow suggestions?)
Message from richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Hassy CFV workflow suggestions?)
Message from richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Hassy CFV workflow suggestions?)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Hassy CFV workflow suggestions?)