Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/01/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Mark.. while I really do believe the M9 is a better choice (in some ways), there is a $4.5K or so difference in the prices right now.... And I do not have, will not have, nor wish to spend an additional $4.5K in disposable income for a Digi-M. The choice was simple.... get an M8 or not get a Digi-M. And I believe for many, many amateur Leica enthusiasts, I am not alone. Yes, I wish it had a FF sensor, no IR filters, a menu to select lenses from, etc...... But the price difference is just too compelling..... The M8 is certainly a viable option for the Digi-M solution to a vast group of Leica shooters..... YMMV, especially if you are a PRO or get paid for your work..... or ( at the risk of again being considered not PC) are a Rich Doctor, Lawyer , or Indian Chief. Frank Filippone red735i at earthlink.net No the M8 is not a viable entry level camera into the Leica digital M system at this stage of the game. The smart advice would be to wait. Wait till one had the capital to procure an M9.