Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/10/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] M9 improvements
From: hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson)
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 01:12:47 +1000
References: <C70B1FE2.574CC%mark@rabinergroup.com> <AAC70230-D98E-4FA6-BD1B-2B47F6A1FA70@btinternet.com> <35610820-F556-4185-BD6F-50B1A00862DC@frozenlight.eu> <46355ECD-8E5E-42AF-9A2B-F7552990BB74@gmail.com> <25F5C5CD-6910-40C5-B06B-8AF462DF9B9B@mac.com> <013e01ca5966$0ac63aa0$2052afe0$@net> <FD70C29E-3EB5-4E36-8007-C831FB8385BB@btinternet.com>

Frank its been hashed over a lot elsewhere and the final word is from Stefan
Daniel. About 20 'enthusiasts' nearly coming to blows trying to put their
optical theories forward to each other! The optical reality is .68 in the
marginally thicker M8 and M9 bodies. You might like to watch the interview
with Stefan Daniel to see why this is so.
If you've owned the M6 in .85 you'd see that the 35 frame is really the
limit there. Personally I found the 35 marginal . I don't wear my glasses
when photographing and do scrunch my eye in there too. 28 frame visible and
usable (if you don't have glasses) in the .72 and .68. Magnifiers useful
with the longer lenses certainly. External 28 finder works well for zone
focus grabs or infinity shots.

>
> On 30 Oct, 2009, at 13:36, Frank Filippone wrote:
>
> If you can put either a 0.85 finder or a 0.72 finder in the same sized
>> M6TTL, I see no reason that the .72 finder could not have accommodated in
>> a
>> M8 or M9 as a 0.72 finder, thicker body or not.
>>
>> If they had put in the 0.85 module, the finder would have been .... ( Math
>> time out...) .68/.72 *.85= 0.80
>>
>> Maybe the M8/M9 issue was time to  market, and getting it done quickly,
>> using available finder designs and mechanisms, therefore the shortened .68
>> finder..
>>
>> Maybe the Elves will offer different finder options in the future.
>>
>> Frank Filippone
>> red735i at earthlink.net
>>
>> The M9 finder is the good old 0,72 in a deeper body = 0,68.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
Cheers
Geoff
The new LEICA M9
Passion for perfect pictures.
http://www.m.leica-camera.com

http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/gh/
http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman


In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] LCD Protector for M9)
Message from Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie) ([Leica] LCD Protector for M9)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] M9 improvements)
Message from lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll Querol) ([Leica] M9 improvements)
Message from lucien_vd at mac.com (lucien_vd at mac.com) ([Leica] M9 improvements)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] M9 improvements)
Message from Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie) ([Leica] M9 improvements)