Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/10/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Nathan, as you say these are mostly importanty for the market that than for me. ISO performence is always welcome but not a really need for me, I prefer other facilities as: - Viewfinder at least 0,72x - Sensor auto cleaning - Block the selector, it is too easy to move it Saludos, Lluis El 26/10/2009, a las 18:58, Nathan Wajsman escribi?: > I can think of at least the following that would be included in a > future M10: > > - better high ISO performance (whether or not at the cost of > reducing pixel count must depend on the state of sensor technology > in a couple of years) > - a flip-out LCD with Live View > - video capability > - geo tagging and other snazzy features found on modern cameras > - wifi or bluetooth or 3G/4G capability > > Not all of these are important to me personally (the first two are), > but I can imagine that they are for the market. > > Nathan > > Nathan Wajsman > Alicante, Spain > http://www.frozenlight.eu > http://www.greatpix.eu > http://www.nathanfoto.com > > Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0 > PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws > Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog > > > > On Oct 26, 2009, at 6:22 PM, Frank Dernie wrote: > >> For me the Leica M9 is spot on. They could have made it just for >> me :-) >> I, for one would not trade less resolution for higher iso, though >> of course higher iso would not be a retrograde step... >> Frank >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information