Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/10/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] M9 improvements
From: lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll Querol)
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 19:40:55 +0100
References: <C70B1FE2.574CC%mark@rabinergroup.com> <AAC70230-D98E-4FA6-BD1B-2B47F6A1FA70@btinternet.com> <35610820-F556-4185-BD6F-50B1A00862DC@frozenlight.eu> <46355ECD-8E5E-42AF-9A2B-F7552990BB74@gmail.com> <4AE5E5F3.1010105@gmx.de> <8c8849060910261128u425255cfrbd1a188673fd42b3@mail.gmail.com>

Jerry,

I didn't know, is the M9 body still bigger than M8?

Yes, I add your wish too, like the MP

Saludos
Lluis


El 26/10/2009, a las 19:28, Jerry Justianto escribi?:

> My wish list:
>
> 1. Nikon or Canon Sensor
> 2. Wider and better ISO 50-6400, considering most of us have  
> summiluxes.
> 3. Live-View
> 4. Bigger LCD
> 5. Sensor cleaner mechanism.
> 6. Smaller body just like MP
>
> JSJ
>
>
> On 10/27/09, Douglas Sharp <douglas.sharp at gmx.de> wrote:
>> And a price reduction of about 1000 euros :-)
>> Douglas
>>
>> Lluis Ripoll Querol wrote:
>>> Nathan, as you say these are mostly importanty for the market that
>>> than for me.
>>>
>>> ISO performence is always welcome but not a really need for me, I
>>> prefer other facilities as:
>>>
>>> - Viewfinder at least 0,72x
>>> - Sensor auto cleaning
>>> - Block the selector, it is too easy to move it
>>>
>>> Saludos,
>>> Lluis
>>>
>>>
>>> El 26/10/2009, a las 18:58, Nathan Wajsman escribi?:
>>>
>>>> I can think of at least the following that would be included in a
>>>> future M10:
>>>>
>>>> - better high ISO performance (whether or not at the cost of  
>>>> reducing
>>>> pixel count must depend on the state of sensor technology in a  
>>>> couple
>>>> of years)
>>>> - a flip-out LCD with Live View
>>>> - video capability
>>>> - geo tagging and other snazzy features found on modern cameras
>>>> - wifi or bluetooth or 3G/4G capability
>>>>
>>>> Not all of these are important to me personally (the first two  
>>>> are),
>>>> but I can imagine that they are for the market.
>>>>
>>>> Nathan
>>>>
>>>> Nathan Wajsman
>>>> Alicante, Spain
>>>> http://www.frozenlight.eu
>>>> http://www.greatpix.eu
>>>> http://www.nathanfoto.com
>>>>
>>>> Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0
>>>> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
>>>> Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Oct 26, 2009, at 6:22 PM, Frank Dernie wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> For me the Leica M9 is spot on. They could have made it just for  
>>>>> me :-)
>>>>> I, for one would not trade less resolution for higher iso,  
>>>>> though of
>>>>> course higher iso would not be a retrograde step...
>>>>> Frank
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more  
>>>> information
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>
>>
>
> -- 
> Sent from my mobile device
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from lug at steveunsworth.co.uk (Steve Unsworth) ([Leica] M9 improvements)
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] LCD Protector for M9)
Message from Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie) ([Leica] LCD Protector for M9)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] M9 improvements)
Message from lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll Querol) ([Leica] M9 improvements)
Message from douglas.sharp at gmx.de (Douglas Sharp) ([Leica] M9 improvements)
Message from jsjgroups at gmail.com (Jerry Justianto) ([Leica] M9 improvements)