Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/08/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] 50/1.1 Nokton
From: jsmith342 at gmail.com (Jefffery Smith)
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 09:15:55 -0500
References: <C69FE021.526FE%mark@rabinergroup.com> <08999416-6F3F-4F8F-96D4-A1454923E573@gmail.com>

You have to take into account that everyone in the photos is 59 years  
old. ;-)

Part of my enthusiasm is the dim lighting that was available to me in  
many of them. There is a big difference between f/1.4 and f/1.1, and  
many lesser lenses are soft wide open. I don't find the bokeh to be  
bad. Anyway, I'm happy with it.

Jeffery


On Aug 6, 2009, at 12:48 AM, Steve Barbour wrote:

> On Aug 5, 2009, at 10:19 PM, Mark Rabiner wrote:
>
>>> http://www.400tx.com/files/Hilltop/1.html
>>>
>>> They didn't need sharpening. This is a very sharp lens wide open.
>>>
>>> Jeffery
>>
>>
>> Jeffrey I don't think in digital photography its a thing where some  
>> lenses
>> require sharpening and others do not because they're so sharp to  
>> begin with.
>> Sharpening is pretty much part of the process.
>> Though people are saying its not needed with an M8 because of the  
>> lack of
>> anti aliasing pane of glass. No idea of that's true or not. I'm  
>> guessing
>> they'd still need some slight sharpening.
>> At the size we're looking at it on the screen you cant really tell.
>> It could be resized.
>> But it looks real soft to me.
>> If the eyelashes are sharp they are too small to see.
>
> I took a look Jeffery, expecting to be blown away...
>
> truth to tell Jeffery, the images that I see look quite fine...they  
> should, they are jpegs that fill about 20% of my screen...
> acceptable,  no more...not terribly impressive to me in any way, you  
> really can't tell more...nor should you.
>
> Not better than a dozen other 50mm lenses shot wide open, by you and  
> others over the years...my impression is if anything, I've seen  
> better.
>
> This lens may be great, these images don't prove it.
>
> Sorry, personally I can't see it, I always wonder how a new lens  
> would fare in a blinded taste test.
>
> Steve
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from ricc at embarqmail.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] 50/1.1 Nokton)
Reply from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] 50/1.1 Nokton)
Reply from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] 50/1.1 Nokton)
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] 50/1.1 Nokton)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] 50/1.1 Nokton)