Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/07/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi Frank, I wondered your thoughts on Lotus' road cars. I had a Europa Special and it is a marvel. Very light, incredible suspension, and so responsive. I thought Colin Chapman brilliant and was stunned at his premature passing. I could never afford one of todays 'supercars' but if I could I would likely own a Lotus and use some of that "leftover" money for a worthy cause. I agree the Veyron is an ugly piece ;-) But, Lotus aside, what do you make of the Ariel Atom? Dennis Frank Dernie wrote: > Pagani Zonda. > For "frequent" use Ferrari 599. > For daily use Porsche 911 turbo. > For pure driving Lotus anything. > > There are lots of cars about which have fancy styling and are "2 seat > limos" with loads of kit, weight and electronic driving aids to make > them easy to drive for less good drivers. > These are great pose-mobiles and practical for a rich person of > limited talent to show-off in. > > I may have left some out, I am neither wealthy enough nor interested > enough to study in detail. Weight is the most important chassis > parameter for performance. Road cars are to a great extent a fashion > item and image statement. Published stuff tends to be acceleration and > top speed. It is possible to get impressive figures for these without > much chassis sophistication at all. Since weight is currently not > something fashionable to minimise "supercars" are now as heavy as > trucks, hence no longer supercars IMO. This Bugatti thing weighs the > same as 2 Ford GT40s! > > To put perspective on this, +10kg on a F1 car loses over 0.3 secs per > lap. > > Frank