Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/05/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] CV 1.4/40mm and 1.2/35mm on M8 - what is your experience?
From: henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff)
Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 11:08:12 -0700
References: <856746.98404.qm@web86710.mail.ird.yahoo.com>

There is no default focal length setting.

My thin Tele-Elmarit 90 gets recognized as a 90 about 85% of the 
time. It's definitely uncoded. Non of my uncoded 35mm lenses gets 
recognized.


At 1:54 PM +0000 5/15/09, FRANK DERNIE wrote:
>I would not say the default code is 35mm. Other non-coded lenses do 
>not show a focal length at all in the data file, including the tri 
>elmar at 28mm and 50mm. The only uncoded lenses which show a focal 
>length at all on my M8 are 35mm. Perhaps the only lens uniquely 
>matching the viewframe indexing mechanism at the mechanical 35mm 
>setting is 35mm????
>Frank
>
>
>--- On Fri, 15/5/09, Frank Filippone <red735i at earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>>  From: Frank Filippone <red735i at earthlink.net>
>>  Subject: Re: [Leica] CV 1.4/40mm and 1.2/35mm on M8 - what is your 
>>experience?
>>  To: "'Leica Users Group'" <lug at leica-users.org>
>>  Date: Friday, 15 May, 2009, 1:59 PM
>>  That's pretty fascinating.....
>>
>>  The default position is 35mm....... without coding....
>>
>>  So why code a 35mm lens and pay $175 to do so?
>>
>>  Frank Filippone
>>  red735i at earthlink.net
>>
>>
>>  I have no idea why but all my 35mm lenses are recognised as
>>  35mm by my M8,
>>  including the 35mm setting on the tri-elmar, even though
>>  they are not coded.
>>  It started after one of the firmware updates IIRC.
>>  Frank
>>


-- 

    *            Henning J. Wulff
   /|\      Wulff Photography & Design
  /###\   mailto:henningw at archiphoto.com
  |[ ]|     http://www.archiphoto.com


In reply to: Message from frank.dernie at btinternet.com (FRANK DERNIE) ([Leica] CV 1.4/40mm and 1.2/35mm on M8 - what is your experience?)