Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/05/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 03:35 PM 5/9/2009, you wrote: >And this specific DNG thing not exactly on the forefront of what most people >think about when they think about working in raw. >I think most photographers have never heard of a DNG. > >We're talking bout the RAW workflow. > >Mark William Rabiner I doubt that. DNG is the non-proprietary RAW that all of the Photoshop and Lightroom gurus suggest converting your RAW to, whether its a NEF or a CRW. It should be a DNG. The only reason not to convert is if you intend to use the camera manufacturer's RAW convertor. But who knows how long those proprietary raws will be around? DNG is here forever as an open file format. The file sizes are smaller as a plus and include all XMP sidecars files within the DNG files. There's also something called Recover Edges in DNG, that I've never used but is supposed to be a good thing. Not all software supports weird raw files but they all support DNG. Tina Tina Manley www.tinamanley.com