Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/03/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Ahh I see. I've kind of settled into focal length spacing of my lenses by roughly doubling each time. 15, 28, 50, and now 90. It keeps me from having too many in between lenses and cover the rest with my feet. If I'm lucky, I might be able to pick up this macro+goggles setup for a good deal less than the 75 cron anyway... On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 7:03 PM, Geoff Hopkinson <hopsternew at gmail.com> wrote: > Tim, because the M8 has a 'crop factor' of 1.33, owing to the sensor being > 18x27mm. That is a 75 on the M8 gives a field of view about the same as a > 100mm lens on a film Leica. > I like the idea of that little macro 90 too, on all flavours of M's. you > would have to get the groovy goggles arrangement though. Very Leica. > > 2009/3/31 Tim Gray <tgray at 125px.com> > >> How so? ?For the record, I'm using film. >> >> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 6:42 PM, Geoff Hopkinson <hopsternew at gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > Tim, the discussion needs to be qualified depending on whether you are >> using >> > these lenses on a film or digital M though. >> > >> > 2009/3/30 Tim Gray <tgray at 125px.com> >> > >> >> I've thought about the 75 for that reason, and while it might cover >> >> some of the same ground close in, it's ultimately a 75mm lens. ?Which >> >> means I don't have the reach of a 90 when I want it, and also will not >> >> have the perspective of a 90 for portraits, etc. ?I already have a >> >> nice 50mm lens, and I think the 75 will be a bit too close to that. >> >> It's also not as compact, and for the price, you can get the whole 90 >> >> macro set, which does give you better close up abilities. >> >> >> >> Though, I do agree, if 75mm suits your style, you can fill some of the >> >> gaps with that lens. >> >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 1:56 AM, Mark Rabiner <mark at >> >> rabinergroup.com> >> >> wrote: >> >> > Although if its a macro in the SLR world sense of the word its not >> >> optimized >> >> > for infinity but close in. >> >> > And flat field though I'd not ask for that in this case. >> >> > But think it might be a one in four chance its there. >> >> > >> >> > Me I shoot a lot more pix at 4 feet than infinity so I find macros >> >> > agreeable. >> >> > And I like they cause they're slow and often have well protected >> >> > front >> >> > elements which don't even require lens hoods. >> >> > But often the find themselves too heavy. To many extra elements I >> guess >> >> so >> >> > they do well close in and are ableI'v to rack out. All that >> >> > machinery. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > Mark William Rabiner >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> From: Henning Wulff <henningw at archiphoto.com> >> >> >> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> >> >> >> Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 20:30:52 -0700 >> >> >> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> >> >> >> Subject: Re: [Leica] 90mm Macro Elmar M >> >> >> >> >> >> Anyone interested in the 90 macro should note that the 75 Summicron >> >> >> (or Summilux, for that matter) will enable a reproduction ration of >> >> >> 1:7, whereas the 90 macro, without eyes will enable a rep.ratio of >> >> >> 1:6.7. Essentially the same. >> >> >> >> >> >> So if you have or are considering either of these 75's, and don't >> >> >> intend to get the goggles for the 90 macro, don't bother unless >> >> >> other >> >> >> qualities like the collapsibility are your main reasons. >> >> >> >> >> >> Or get the 90 and goggles, as that combo definitely allows the >> >> >> highest magnification on an M without Visoflex. >> >> >> >> >> >> BTW, the 75 Summicron works excellently in the close up range, what >> >> >> with its floating elements for correction. The Summilux doesn't do >> >> >> as >> >> >> well. >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> >> >> >> ? ? * ? ? ? ? ? ?Henning J. Wulff >> >> >> ? ?/|\ ? ? ?Wulff Photography & Design >> >> >> ? /###\ ? mailto:henningw at archiphoto.com >> >> >> ? |[ ]| ? ? http://www.archiphoto.com >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> >> Leica Users Group. >> >> >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> >> > Leica Users Group. >> >> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> >> > >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Leica Users Group. >> >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Cheers >> > Geoff >> > 'Life's too short for mediocre glass' >> > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/gh/a/ >> > http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Leica Users Group. >> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > > > > -- > Cheers > Geoff > 'Life's too short for mediocre glass' > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/gh/a/ > http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >