Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2009/02/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re: Cheaper Leica
From: douglas.sharp at gmx.de (Douglas Sharp)
Date: Tue Feb 17 12:50:10 2009
References: <200902170300.n1H30IaS007669@server1.waverley.reid.org> <7875AF61-89CE-4F46-B685-BFE10DE1B82D@optonline.net> <36172e5a0902162241h19c3de47h7b79ac76190bf796@mail.gmail.com> <8D555D84-5209-44D9-B16F-FA733180E6E6@teleport.com><36172e5a0902170003oee34f08rbf6cce8f36127102@mail.gmail.com> <499A8B7A.9080904@gmx.de> <584FA2308FEB4DC3B8CB62C87B4BBC61@precisionm50>
They chose the wrong sized batteries :-)
Douglas
Bob W wrote:
> How come the M8 is so much bigger than the M3 then?
>
> Bob
>
>
>> Larry,
>> there's plenty of room in the film chamber for all the
>> electronics you
>> could ever need for a camera. removing the take up spool would also
>> provude room for the power source.
>>
>> I'm still rather sad about the eventual failure of the Rollei 3003
>> concept, that would have been ideal for an interchangeable
>> digital back.
>> (Rollei did have one planned, recording images on a floppy,
>> but it never
>> got far beyond the prototype stage).
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
In reply to:
Message from lrzeitlin at optonline.net (Lawrence Zeitlin) ([Leica] Re: Cheaper Leica)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Re: Cheaper Leica)
Message from mak at teleport.com (Mark Kronquist) ([Leica] Re: Cheaper Leica)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Re: Cheaper Leica)
Message from douglas.sharp at gmx.de (Douglas Sharp) ([Leica] Re: Cheaper Leica)
Message from leica at web-options.com (Bob W) ([Leica] Re: Cheaper Leica)