Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/01/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Bokeh yes
From: philippe.amard at tele2.fr (Philippe AMARD)
Date: Tue Jan 20 13:18:56 2009
References: <1062048673.254751232473444566.JavaMail.root@mail02.pantherlink.uwm.edu>

Alan,
 these are slightly too small for me to really assess bokeh - at this 
scale variation may also result simply from what f 2 means on any lens, 
plus focus tolerances.
Nice collections anyhow.
Thanks for sharing
Slainte
Philippe


Alan Magayne-Roshak wrote:

>On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 Douglas Nygren <dnygr@cshore.com>wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Bokeh has caught my fancy of late.
>>I'm sure this has been discussed and that there is a diversity of 
>>opinion.
>>    
>>
>
>  
>
>>I'd be interested in learnng which lenses you all feel have the best 
>>bokeh and why, of course.
>>    
>>
>
>  
>
>>Best--Doug
>>    
>>
>=============================================================================
>Coincidentally, I received my Olympus to Canon lens adapter last week, and 
>with my 30D, did some 
>comparisons between the Canon AF 50mm f/1.8, an old Nikkor 50mm f/1.4, and 
>a Zuiko 50mm f/1.8:  
>
><http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Alan+Magayne-Roshak/LensFun/Canon_50mm_at_f2AF.jpg.html>
><http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Alan+Magayne-Roshak/LensFun/Nikkor_50mm_at_f2.jpg.html>
><http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Alan+Magayne-Roshak/LensFun/Zuiko_50mm_at_f1_8.jpg.html>
>
>In these shots there are slight variations in the out of focus highlights, 
>and even DoF (look at the Pony 
>camera on the left - it looks sharper in the Nikkor shot).  The first two 
>lenses have a setting for f/2, but 
>the Zuiko doesn't, so that one is at f/1.8.
>
>Here is that Zuiko 50 and my favorite Olympus lens, the 100mm f/2.8 (both 
>at closest focus).  I've always 
>liked the oof rendering of this lens at f/2.8:
>
><http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Alan+Magayne-Roshak/LensFun/Z_50mm_at_f1_8.jpg.html>
><http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Alan+Magayne-Roshak/LensFun/Z_100mm_at_f2_8.jpg.html>
><http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Alan+Magayne-Roshak/LensFun/Z_100mm_f2_8WideOpen_.jpg.html>
>
>Bokeh rendering of some misc. lenses:
>
>50mm Summitar at f/2:
><http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Alan+Magayne-Roshak/BigBird_AMR.jpg.html>
>
>Nikkor 85mm f/2 LTM at f/2.8.  I love the bokeh of this lens:
><http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Alan+Magayne-Roshak/Fowl_AMR.jpg.html>
>
>My custom 135mm Elmar:
><http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Alan+Magayne-Roshak/Color/BerriesLeaves_AMR.jpg.html>
><http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Alan+Magayne-Roshak/Color/ThreeBlooms_AMR.jpg.html>
>
>Last, look at the tunnel-like look to this Victorian era Darlot when used 
>wide open at f/4.8:
><http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Alan+Magayne-Roshak/Portraits/Kathryn1_AMR.jpg.html>
>Stopped down, this effect is minimized.
>
>Alan
>
>Alan Magayne-Roshak, Senior Photographer
>UPAA POY 1978
>University Information Technology Services
>University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
>http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Alan+Magayne-Roshak/
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>  
>

In reply to: Message from amr3 at uwm.edu (Alan Magayne-Roshak) ([Leica] Bokeh yes)