Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/01/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]> Some time ago, I became acquainted with a veteran from the Spanish > Civil War. He was lucky enough to have been repatriated to > the United > States. That was before, and just barely, Petain had those interned > on the French side of the border sent to the Mauthausen-Gusen camp. > So while we were talking, I asked a question for which I could never > get a straight answer. That was whether the Mexican > contingent in the > Republican forces were the largest group of foreign volunteers, as > most historical presentation would have it. Without hesitation, he > said the Cubans were. I stood there, somewhat transfixed for a > moment, and said to him, now it makes sense. That is, the American > reaction(s) to Cuba. > sd I don't understand how this makes sense of the US attitude towards Cuba, and I'd be grateful if you could explain. I don't know a great deal about this, but I sutudied a bit of Spanish history when I was learning Spanish at college, and some of my school teachers were veterans of the civil war. Here is how I figure it - please correct me if I've got things wrong: The Spanish Civil War (73 years ago) was a long time before the Cuban revolution (50 years and 3 days ago), and before the revolution Cuba was a banana republic client of the USA. Since the USA was neutral about the Spanish Civil War it's likely that the Cuban government's position would also have been officially neutral, and Cubans who went to Spain would have been volunteers, even if unofficially helped by the government. Given the historical relationship between Spain and Cuba it would be entirely understandable for many Cubans to wish to be involved in the civil war on one side or the other, but they would, officially at least, have been volunteers who went under their own steam. The current attitude of the US towards Cuba arises from the time of the Cuban revolution and the relationship between Cuba and the then Soviet Union. The Cuban revolution did so a great deal of damage to US interests over there; Cuba, with Soviet backing, tried to export the revolution to other parts of Central and South America, and Cuba became a potential bridgehead for the Soviets into the US, so the USA took a hard line about relationships with Cuba. Since the collapse of the Soviet Union the hard line is continued not because of any real threat to the US from Cuba, but because of continued vested political interests. I'd be interested to find out why you think the Spanish Civil War has anything to do with the US attitude to Cuba. Bob