Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/01/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMG: Common Goldeneye
From: afirkin at afirkin.com (Alastair Firkin)
Date: Fri Jan 2 20:42:07 2009

Don't think either is your best, the second is "easier" to interpret and I 
like the bow wave. The colour of the water is more attractive as well. The 
detail of the water on the feathers of the first one is great. Could you be 
too close? Either would be a fine addition to any "guide" book as there is 
such fine detail in the bird itself.

Cheers

--- wildlightphoto@earthlink.net wrote:

From: wildlightphoto@earthlink.net
To: "lug@leica-users.org" <lug@leica-users.org>, LEG <leica@freelists.org>,  
      LeicaReflex <leicareflex@freelists.org>
Cc:
Subject: [Leica] IMG: Common Goldeneye
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 20:36:21 -0800 (GMT-08:00)

The new year starts off with a quack (not really, this duck squeaks more 
than quacks):

http://wildlightphoto.com/birds/anatidae/cogo00.html
http://wildlightphoto.com/birds/anatidae/cogo01.html

Tech stuff:
a very foggy day in Sacramento County
R8/DMR
560mm f/6.8 Telyt
shoulder stock & monopod
1/360 sec @ f/6.8

All comments welcome.

Doug Herr
Birdman of Sacramento
http://www.wildlightphoto.com



_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information