Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/01/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Don't think either is your best, the second is "easier" to interpret and I like the bow wave. The colour of the water is more attractive as well. The detail of the water on the feathers of the first one is great. Could you be too close? Either would be a fine addition to any "guide" book as there is such fine detail in the bird itself. Cheers --- wildlightphoto@earthlink.net wrote: From: wildlightphoto@earthlink.net To: "lug@leica-users.org" <lug@leica-users.org>, LEG <leica@freelists.org>, LeicaReflex <leicareflex@freelists.org> Cc: Subject: [Leica] IMG: Common Goldeneye Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 20:36:21 -0800 (GMT-08:00) The new year starts off with a quack (not really, this duck squeaks more than quacks): http://wildlightphoto.com/birds/anatidae/cogo00.html http://wildlightphoto.com/birds/anatidae/cogo01.html Tech stuff: a very foggy day in Sacramento County R8/DMR 560mm f/6.8 Telyt shoulder stock & monopod 1/360 sec @ f/6.8 All comments welcome. Doug Herr Birdman of Sacramento http://www.wildlightphoto.com _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information