Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/12/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Unbelievable
From: photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman)
Date: Sat Dec 20 21:41:59 2008
References: <200812191850.mBJIoLOK082794@server1.waverley.reid.org><F2CB7526-0E54-4567-8BD3-FCBAD125CDFA@optonline.net> <279BCBA7039E46EB93719C56BFF713CC@xyw> <122120080018.426.494D8B5D0009A410000001AA223245003003010CD2079C080C03BF970A9D9F9A0B9D09@mchsi.com>

During my Leica film days, at various times I owned the 35mm Summicron  
ASPH and the 35mm Summilux ASPH. Now I have the new 35mm Summarit, and  
frankly I cannot detect any quality loss over those other two lenses  
(OK, the Summarit is a half stop slower than the Summicron and 1 1/2  
stops slower than the Summilux; and it does not come with the hood). I  
really think Leica has hit a home run with the Summarit lenses.

Nathan

Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
http://www.nathanfoto.com

Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog



On Dec 21, 2008, at 1:18 AM, grduprey@mchsi.com wrote:

>
>
> They are already doing this with their Summarit line of lenses,  
> which the 28 Elmarit Asph should also fit into this category.  The  
> problem they are having with this line is that many feel these are  
> compromise lens designs, and not real leica lenses, although they  
> are, and are actually made by leica in germany, which you cannot say  
> for the zeiss line of m lenses, but are in the same price point.   
> From what I have seen and this is also shown by Nathan's recent  
> postings using his 35 Summarit, is that these are indeed worthy of  
> the leica lable.
>
>
> Gene -------------- Original message from "A. Lal"  
> <alal@duke.poly.edu>: --------------
>
>
>> Alternatively, the current Leica company could set up its own  
>> manufacturing
>> facilities in a low-cost country, while maintaining current QC  
>> standards.
>>
>> As I see it, Leica may be trying to follow the example the Swiss  
>> watch
>> industry which has not been price sensitive in the recent past. I  
>> do not
>> believe this strategy will work. Leica need to find a way to reduce  
>> prices
>> significantly while retaining quality.
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Lawrence Zeitlin"
>> To:
>> Cc: "Lawrence Zeitlin"
>> Sent: Friday, 19 December, 2008 2:29 PM
>> Subject: [Leica] Re: Unbelievable
>>
>>
>>> If Leica couldn't find an overwhelming sympathetic audience in  
>>> the  LUG,
>>> it is unlikely to do so in the general camera using population.   
>>> Leica's
>>> plight is similar. on a much smaller scale, to that of the  U.S.  
>>> auto
>>> industry. Their best bet might be to ask for a bailout or  bridge  
>>> loan
>>> from the German government and, if they can't return to   
>>> profitability
>>> within six months, file for bankruptcy. Their best  strategy might  
>>> be to
>>> sell the Leica name, patents, and manufacturing  rights to one of  
>>> the
>>> Japanese camera giants. The precedent has been  set by Contax,
>>> Voightlander, and scores of others. Then perhaps we  might have  
>>> affordable
>>> Leica cameras, although a bit plasticky.
>>>
>>> Larry Z
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from lrzeitlin at optonline.net (Lawrence Zeitlin) ([Leica] Re: Unbelievable)
Message from alal at duke.poly.edu (A. Lal) ([Leica] Re: Unbelievable)
Message from grduprey at mchsi.com (grduprey@mchsi.com) ([Leica] Re: Unbelievable)