Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2008/12/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re: Unbelievable
From: richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man)
Date: Sat Dec 20 15:32:54 2008
References: <200812192238.mBJMcWqP029064@server1.waverley.reid.org> <BLU121-DS680A361B7374EA7F19661D4F10@phx.gbl> <494CF6E0.1060702@mcclary.net> <3cad89990812200645r3d5745faoe0e434bdf47904df@mail.gmail.com> <494D6085.5040900@mcclary.net> <9580F7DA-99F6-42FC-9C56-C8A90FA624F2@mac.com> <494D7A5B.9080308@mcclary.net>
The alignment problem is exaggerated. It was very easy to fix by oneself. If
they price is at $1500 to $2000, it may have flown off the shelves.
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 3:06 PM, Harrison McClary <lists@mcclary.net> wrote:
> If it had not had all the problems I read about then I'd have gotten one.
> But the stories about poor rangefinder alignment, and things like that
> kept
> me away...also it was not exactly in the category I was taking about, if I
> remember it was around 3 grand new. They are still 1500 used or so...I'd
> rather save a few more pennies and get a used M8 with all I have hear about
> the RD1. Now had the RD1 been a decent camera with good customer
> support...that'd have made a difference to me.
>
>
--
// richard m: richard @imagecraft.com
// b: http://richardfman.wordpress.com
Replies:
Reply from Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie) ([Leica] Re: Unbelievable)
In reply to:
Message from leicar at q.com (Aram Langhans) ([Leica] Re: Unbelievable)
Message from lists at mcclary.net (Harrison McClary) ([Leica] Re: Unbelievable)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] Re: Unbelievable)
Message from lists at mcclary.net (Harrison McClary) ([Leica] Re: Unbelievable)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] Re: Unbelievable)
Message from lists at mcclary.net (Harrison McClary) ([Leica] Re: Unbelievable)