Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/12/19[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
But Harrison, the Leica bodies I have known are the epitome of simplicity and lack of bells and whistles. What could they possibly cut feature wise to make an entry level camera? The only thing they could do is cut the quality. Not what people expect from a Leica. Aram Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 15:32:53 -0600 From: Harrison McClary <firstname.lastname@example.org> Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Unbelievable To: Leica Users Group <email@example.com> Message-ID: <494C1305.firstname.lastname@example.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed I wonder how big of a market there is for the "Best of" cameras. The EOS1DsIII while a great camera has a great price tag also. As does the new D3x or whatever Nikon calls theirs. If Canon and Nikon did not make D40's and Digital Rebels I do not think they'd be the profitable companies they are. Leica really needs to consider making some entry level cameras also. The number of people who will pay 1200- 2000 for a new body are far greater than those who will pay 5grand for one.