Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2008/12/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re: Unbelievable
From: imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George)
Date: Sat Dec 20 14:54:45 2008
References: <200812192238.mBJMcWqP029064@server1.waverley.reid.org> <BLU121-DS680A361B7374EA7F19661D4F10@phx.gbl> <494CF6E0.1060702@mcclary.net> <3cad89990812200645r3d5745faoe0e434bdf47904df@mail.gmail.com> <494D6085.5040900@mcclary.net>
Wasn't that the Epson RD1?
It should have flown off the shelves like an iPod.
Fond regards,
George
george@imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
On Dec 20, 2008, at 3:15 PM, Harrison McClary wrote:
> I was meaning just that, a M mount that is less expensive to
> introduce more people to the thrills of Leica. The CL was just
> this, not an M by any means, but still a decent enough camera and
> it used M lenses. The Pana/Leicas are nice, I just bought one for
> my daughter...but an M or even a "pretend" M it is not.
Replies:
Reply from lists at mcclary.net (Harrison McClary) ([Leica] Re: Unbelievable)
In reply to:
Message from leicar at q.com (Aram Langhans) ([Leica] Re: Unbelievable)
Message from lists at mcclary.net (Harrison McClary) ([Leica] Re: Unbelievable)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] Re: Unbelievable)
Message from lists at mcclary.net (Harrison McClary) ([Leica] Re: Unbelievable)