Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/12/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Bad news at Leica - worse than that
From: kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour)
Date: Sun Dec 7 14:01:29 2008
References: <200812071106.mB7B5vSw034467@server1.waverley.reid.org> <BLU121-DS64114E3BADBD34E136738D4FC0@phx.gbl> <493C3D74.8010802@tele2.fr> <B1F97A20-7295-4639-B4C3-D95B99B3807E@mac.com> <493C452A.5060008@tele2.fr>

On Dec 7, 2008, at 2:50 PM, Philippe AMARD wrote:

> Lottermoser George wrote:
>
>> I certainly don't feel betrayed.
>>
> George - you're among the rare/exclusive/so few (officially 5000,  
> minus those who had faulty never replaced gear) lucky DMR owners.
> Do you really think this matches the potential of R users?
> This is where R users have been betrayed.
> Plus the delay for a replacement R9.2 Diesel.
>
> I am not referring to the quality of the DMR as such, and your  
> photographs, Doug's and others prove it everyday.
> The rest of us have been simply ignored.
> Typisch Leica!


don't worry Philippe, they are going to start planning the new R10  
sometime next year,


Steve


>
> Bien amicalement
> Philippe
>
>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from philippe.amard at tele2.fr (Philippe AMARD) ([Leica] Bad news at Leica - worse than that)
In reply to: Message from leicar at q.com (Aram Langhans) ([Leica] Bad news at Leica)
Message from philippe.amard at tele2.fr (Philippe AMARD) ([Leica] Bad news at Leica - worse than that)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] Bad news at Leica - worse than that)
Message from philippe.amard at tele2.fr (Philippe AMARD) ([Leica] Bad news at Leica - worse than that)