Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/12/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Bad news at Leica - FF or crop survey
From: imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George)
Date: Sun Dec 7 11:31:32 2008
References: <C560F4F7.460A3%mark@rabinergroup.com> <6910A756-341B-4D31-88B8-312E7C70875F@frozenlight.eu> <98F50756-443E-4A6A-84E9-3AB52B1EB578@cox.net>

not if you consider
fine detail rendering
dynamic range
and
print size

then both
bit depth
and sensor area size
matters a great deal

and the same holds true
for 35mm vs 120 vs 4x5 vs 8x10
(given that each format is using the same emulsion)

Fond regards,
George

george@imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist



On Dec 7, 2008, at 11:42 AM, Steve Barbour wrote:

>
> On Dec 7, 2008, at 3:49 AM, Nathan Wajsman wrote:
>
>> I went from film to Canon 1.6 sensor to Canon 1.3 sensor to  
>> Olympus 4/3. Not hung up on sensor size at all, the results are  
>> what count.
>>
>> This whole sensor size discussion -- is it any different from the  
>> discussion about film size decades ago, when the 4x5 shooters  
>> sneered at MF and later the MF folk sneered at 35mm?
>
> I entirely agree Nathan, especially if you change lenses, you get  
> the same results as before...
>
> "and if you didn't know...you wouldn't know..."
>
> it's a bit like being hung up over the ideal font size,
>
>
> Steve
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>> Nathan
>>
>> Nathan Wajsman
>> Alicante, Spain
>> http://www.frozenlight.eu
>> http://www.greatpix.eu
>> http://www.nathanfoto.com
>>
>> Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0
>> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
>> Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog
>>
>>
>>
>> On Dec 7, 2008, at 9:35 AM, Mark Rabiner wrote:
>>
>>> This is a Leica list. Some think "the" Leica list.
>>> On this list how many of use are shooting with DSLR's?
>>> Most of us. The majority of us by far though quite a few of us of  
>>> course are
>>> getting good use out of our M8's.
>>>
>>> Of the vast majority of us who are getting most of our shots with  
>>> DSLR's how
>>> many of use are FF's and how many of us are croppers?
>>>
>>> I think must of us on this list are FFers.
>>> I'd love a survey.
>>> or if many of us "weighed in".
>>>
>>> I unfortunately and not for long am shooting at 1.5 crop  as I  
>>> have been for
>>> years first with a Nikon D100 when it first hit now D200 and D40x -
>>> But not for long.
>>> I got my eye on January 17th for my upgrade date.
>>> I like the idea of a 50mm being my "normal" focal length again.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> mark@rabinergroup.com
>>> Mark William Rabiner
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> From: Mark Rabiner <mark@rabinergroup.com>
>>>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
>>>> Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2008 21:18:35 -0500
>>>> To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
>>>> Conversation: [Leica] Bad news at Leica
>>>> Subject: Re: [Leica] Bad news at Leica
>>>>
>>>> Right now APS-2 and similar 1.5 or close to it crop systems are  
>>>> starting to
>>>> be be referred to as "small sensor cameras". This will be the  
>>>> preferred
>>>> terminology in a week or so.
>>>>
>>>> In six months you will be hard pressed do find ANYONE
>>>> Doing anything resembling serious work with "small sensor cameras".
>>>>
>>>> LEICA and SERIOUS WORK is/are synonymous or should be.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> There will be a GAP where there shouldn't be.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> mark@rabinergroup.com
>>>> Mark William Rabiner
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> From: Bob W <leica@web-options.com>
>>>>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
>>>>> Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 01:35:45 -0000
>>>>> To: 'Leica Users Group' <lug@leica-users.org>
>>>>> Subject: RE: [Leica] Bad news at Leica
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How can we convince them that the M system is ok without AF?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What the M system needs is FF not AF.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Give me FF or give me Death!
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't think AF, FF or Death! are particularly desirable. What  
>>>>> I would
>>>>> prefer is a sensor without the problems,  and a return to the  
>>>>> size of the
>>>>> early M models (M3 etc). So called FF is largely irrelevant  
>>>>> given the
>>>>> resolution of the current sensor, and the availability of  
>>>>> reasonably wide
>>>>> lenses.
>>>>>
>>>>> Bob
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more  
>>>>> information
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more  
>>>> information
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Bad news at Leica - FF or crop survey)
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Bad news at Leica - FF or crop survey)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Bad news at Leica - FF or crop survey)
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Bad news at Leica - FF or crop survey)