Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/11/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Yes Daniel, absolutely agree, the second picture is really fine. Saludos cordiales Lluis El 06/11/2008, a las 20:25, Daniel Ridings escribi?: > Yes, it does, Jim. > > I got it back from a CLA but the high speeds are not right. I get > streaking across half of the frame at 1/1000. It's going back again. > > This is a shot that could be saved: > > http://dlridings.se/gallery/v/Shoebox/200810/08v44-0012.jpg.html > > But you can see it pretty clearly here: > > http://dlridings.se/gallery/v/Shoebox/200810/08v44-0011.jpg.html > > The Elmar, purchased here on the LUG, is several times better after > having it cleaned up inside. It's a very nice lens. The two make a > compact companion with a decent viewfinder. > > Best, > Daniel > > > On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 8:12 PM, Jim Nichols > <jhnichols@bellsouth.net> wrote: >> Daniel, >> >> I bet the IIIg and the 2.8 Elmar make a nice combination. >> >> Jim Nichols >> Tullahoma, TN USA >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Daniel Ridings" <dlridings@gmail.com >> > >> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org> >> Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2008 1:04 PM >> Subject: [Leica] Some goofy signage >> >> >>> http://dlridings.se/gallery/v/Shoebox/200810/08v44-0013.jpg.html >>> >>> IIIg, 50/2.8 Elmar >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Leica Users Group. >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information