Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/11/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Some goofy signage
From: dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings)
Date: Sat Nov 8 08:31:06 2008
References: <a2f8f4470811061104r248e4cdev1104e8ba33901354@mail.gmail.com> <175B294AAE8742CBAAE8AF66E579000D@jimnichols>

Yes, it does, Jim.

I got it back from a CLA but the high speeds are not right. I get
streaking across half of the frame at 1/1000. It's going back again.

This is a shot that could be saved:

http://dlridings.se/gallery/v/Shoebox/200810/08v44-0012.jpg.html

But you can see it pretty clearly here:

http://dlridings.se/gallery/v/Shoebox/200810/08v44-0011.jpg.html

The Elmar, purchased here on the LUG, is several times better after
having it cleaned up inside. It's a very nice lens. The two make a
compact companion with a decent viewfinder.

Best,
Daniel


On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 8:12 PM, Jim Nichols <jhnichols@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> Daniel,
>
> I bet the IIIg and the 2.8 Elmar make a nice combination.
>
> Jim Nichols
> Tullahoma, TN USA
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Daniel Ridings" <dlridings@gmail.com>
> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
> Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2008 1:04 PM
> Subject: [Leica] Some goofy signage
>
>
>> http://dlridings.se/gallery/v/Shoebox/200810/08v44-0013.jpg.html
>>
>> IIIg, 50/2.8 Elmar
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

Replies: Reply from luisripoll at telefonica.net (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] Some goofy signage)
In reply to: Message from dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] Some goofy signage)
Message from jhnichols at bellsouth.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] Some goofy signage)