Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/11/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Gee! SMS language made legal on the lug !
Great fun ahead !
Phx i.e. Phileicangemix
;-)
Peter Klein wrote:
> An amusing side note to "texting." The abbreviations used are often
> very similar to ones used by old-time telegraph operators, which are
> still in use today by amateur radio operators ("Radiosport" for you
> Europeans) who use Morse code. They involved omitting vowels or using
> "sound alikes" to shorten and lessen the number of dots and dashes in
> words, using acronyms, and substituting internationally-known
> telegrapher's sets numbers or three-letter groups for common phrases,
> and such. This became a quasi "language" which enabled operators from
> different countries to carry on rudimentary conversations. For example:
>
> SRI OM VY QRM PSE AGN? HW? K
>
> Which means roughly, Sorry "old man" (a friendly term used among
> mostly male telegraph operators) there's a lot of interference (VY
> QRM), would you please repeat your last transmission? How are you
> receiving me? Go ahead.
>
> Back in the 80s and 90s, there was a major flamefest over whether the
> examinations for amateur radio licenses should continue to include a
> Morse code test. (They've since been abolished). Long-time Morse Code
> operators and traditionalists said yes, (often) younger people who
> were oriented towards more advanced digital communications techniques
> said no. The younger people would often parody the traditional
> abbreviations to ridicule the older group.
>
> Then online chat and texting over your cell phone comes along, and
> what do you know? The young texters quickly developed their own set
> of abbreviations, for much the same reason--efficient use of the
> medium. And it became its own subculture, and is, like, totally cool.
>
> http://www.webopedia.com/quick_ref/textmessageabbreviations.asp#l
>
> OMG GTG L8RG8R!
> --Peter
>
>> > At 11:27 AM 11/2/2008, Eric Korenman wrote:
>> > >I gather we don't 'text' much do we?
>> > >
>> >
>> > What does it mean to 'text'?
>> >
>> > Marc
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>