Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2008/10/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Scanner Progress......
From: dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings)
Date: Mon Oct 13 08:08:03 2008
References: <013101c92cee$6d0d3330$47279990$@net> <013c01c92cf4$0bfb7100$23f25300$@net> <a2f8f4470810130011u594c1202ka589e4367e01b1de@mail.gmail.com> <019401c92d3d$cc524b10$64f6e130$@net> <a2f8f4470810130743k5f783462p542da52dde7807fb@mail.gmail.com> <01a801c92d44$4ffc2340$eff469c0$@net>
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 4:59 PM, Frank Filippone <red735i@earthlink.net>
wrote:
> I used the ICE in the NikkonScan SW. It seemed to do a good job of dust
> removal. Is there some reason why using ICE is not the best idea? Do I
> lose something? I know the negs were dusty.... even directly back from the
> lab....
>From what I remember, the images will often lose resolution with ICE.
Probably not much and probably worth it (dust removal is a real pain).
I can't use ICE. It doesn't work with traditional b/w films. It works
very well with C41 films. I had forgotten about ICE.
Daniel
In reply to:
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Scanner Progress......)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Scanner Progress......)
Message from dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] Scanner Progress......)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Scanner Progress......)
Message from dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] Scanner Progress......)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Scanner Progress......)