Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2008/10/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Vacation Camera Lenses: What did NOT work?
From: luisripoll at telefonica.net (Lluis Ripoll)
Date: Sun Oct 12 13:33:14 2008
References: <008101c92a9e$9391e020$bab5a060$@net> <4cfa589b0810110918y14a40dafx44fa85e74ff4f718@mail.gmail.com> <9C129D5B-56B6-440B-BACA-386CA127B762@mac.com> <200810112208.BBZ48723@rg4.comporium.net> <0ECC314F-9E67-4121-99A6-8B1D277C49D5@telefonica.net> <200810122023.BCA13710@rg4.comporium.net>
Amen Tina,
Lluis
El 12/10/2008, a las 19:23, Tina Manley escribi?:
> At 03:12 PM 10/12/2008, you wrote:
>> Tina,
>>
>> Interesting you take both 35....
>>
>> On my vacations near Barcelona I take all, but when I do a trip, last
>> was to N.Y. in 2005 I've taked 2 M and 21, 35/2, 50/1,4, 75/1,4,
>> and I
>> think (not sure) the actual Elmar 2,8/50 Coll.
>>
>> Saludos cordiales
>> Lluis
>
> Yes, I love the color of the 35/2 but sometimes need the extra speed
> of the 35/1.4. If I had to choose just one, it would be the 35/2 -
> it's so much smaller!
>
> Tina
>
> Tina Manley
> www.tinamanley.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
In reply to:
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Vacation Camera Lenses: What did NOT work?)
Message from abridge at gmail.com (Adam Bridge) ([Leica] Vacation Camera Lenses: What did NOT work?)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] Vacation Camera Lenses: What did NOT work?)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Vacation Camera Lenses: What did NOT work?)
Message from luisripoll at telefonica.net (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] Vacation Camera Lenses: What did NOT work?)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Vacation Camera Lenses: What did NOT work?)