Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/06/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Favorite Non-Leica-Leica Lens?
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Wed Jun 11 11:04:40 2008

That is for sure the question.
How much heavier would an SL2 add to ones kit?
Well I guess we get in a mind set where we have a body, an M, and we want to
just bring along a bunch of lenes to fit on it. I've been in that mind set
before.
SLR glass seems very bloated in a bag filled with rangefinder glass.

Anyway somebody DID come out with a 180 did they not for rangefinder?
Who? Canon?
For screw mount I think.



mark@rabinergroup.com
Mark William Rabiner



> From: Seth Rosner <sethrosner@nycap.rr.com>
> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
> Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 12:46:05 -0400
> To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Favorite Non-Leica-Leica Lens?
> 
> Mark, Sal was quite right about the reach of a 180; but why not just put 
> one
> on an SL or R6 if size is a question? well, thinking about it, a 180/4 
> Elmar
> on Visoflex and an M3 wouldn't be that bulky; unhandy but not that bulky.
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mark Rabiner" <mark@rabinergroup.com>
> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 12:35 PM
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Favorite Non-Leica-Leica Lens?
> 
> 
>> Our late beloved Photographer Sal DiMarco was a great advocate for this:
>> A 180 for the m for more grabbing power.
>> He pushed hard for this. And told us all about it.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> mark@rabinergroup.com
>> Mark William Rabiner
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> From: Philip Forrest <photo.forrest@earthlink.net>
>>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
>>> Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 11:39:59 -0400
>>> To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>, Seth Rosner
>>> <sethrosner@nycap.rr.com>
>>> Subject: Re: [Leica] Favorite Non-Leica-Leica Lens?
>>> 
>>> Wide open and close up it would be very difficult. The 180mm f/2.8 at
>>> close focus and max aperture has just barely more depth of field than a
>>> Noctilux. The fact that a 180mm lens would usually be used over much
>>> longer distances past say, 25 feet would enable the user to accurately
>>> focus the lens. This of course, is all dependent upon the accuracy of
>>> the camera's RF and the VF magnification. A 1.25x magnifier would be a
>>> must have for this application. I think it it could be pulled off if
>>> using an M3 with its great VF magnification and very wide EBL.
>>> Other than that, I just love doing stuff like this because I can. The
>>> challenge of making it work is the whole reason.
>>> 
>>> Phil
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from marcsmall at comcast.net (Marc James Small) ([Leica] Favorite Non-Leica-Leica Lens?)
In reply to: Message from sethrosner at nycap.rr.com (Seth Rosner) ([Leica] Favorite Non-Leica-Leica Lens?)